الفهرس 
الفصل الاوليوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 211 |  |  |
| | | from | 211 | | |
المستخلص
The research came under the title: [Pragmatics in the Great Islamic Epic [Omar], Professor Ali Ahmed Bakathir, deceased (1969 AD) a linguistic study], and deals with the method of circulating the great Islamic epic between the parties to the process during deliberation, the application of the mechanisms of the two approaches: pragmatic and semiological to the epic. Grand Islamic; To be an obstacle in its form to studies related to commercial and semiological studies, and to extract after that what it stores of the language that awaits and speaks in their dialogues, and linguistic signs. And knowing the extent to which the two approaches have been acquainted with what is inside this epic of mechanisms and cognitive components, and some linguistic phenomena. The nature of the research required that it come in three chapters issued with an introduction, in which I explained the introductory lines, the procedural mechanisms of the subject of the study, its importance, the reasons that prompted the researcher to address it, the methodology used in his study, and the divisions of chapters related to the research, and then a preface in which the theoretical introduction to the topic of research was presented by addressing the study of the framework The general theory of linguistic deliberative and semiological theory together. And a conclusion that included a set of results reached by the researcher, and the three chapters were presented as follows: Chapter One: Signs and their deliberative dimensions in the Great Islamic Epic. Chapter Two: Interaction and Verbal Actions in the Great Islamic Epic. Chapter Three: The Semiological Deliberative Dimension in the Great Islamic Epic. The researcher found that the great Islamic epic combined all the deliberative mechanisms and the linguistic and non-linguistic signs to illuminate many semantic and deliberative aspects, and to stand on the essential interpretations that revolve in the minds and purposes of the interlocutors. This helped us in presenting an integrated scientific theory based on the overall structure.