الفهرس 
مقدمةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 406 |  |  |
| | | from | 406 | | |
المستخلص
The defect of delinquency in authority has a great impact on the rights and freedoms of individuals, and it also poses a threat to The administration in and of itself, as it results in the destabilization of the trust that must exist between individuals and the administration. Judicial oversight is the true guarantee of the rights and freedoms of individuals. management rights and the public interest, as they constitute a guarantee and a real field for establishing balance and parity between Conflicting interests, whether they are related to the public or private interest, and they are a real field. (To establish justice between all parties due to the impartiality and independence of the judiciary) It is well known that the main purpose of judicial oversight is to protect individuals, by annulling decisions. Illegal management that causes harm to individuals, and the ruling for compensation for the damage caused Individuals as a result of the conduct of public utilities or by the actions of the administration. Undoubtedly, the administrative decision tainted by the defect of deviation in authority is an invalid decision. project, each individual with an interest may request the administrative court to cancel it as soon as it is issued final, i.e. enforceable, but it may happen sometimes that the decision is implemented before it is revoked, and this implementation results in damage Some individuals are being harmed, and in this case the person who has the wronged right has the right to demand compensation for that. (damage) Despite the stability of the administrative judge’s resolve to describe the administrative decision as the administration’s disclosure of Its binding will, with its authority under the laws and regulations, remain to produce a specific legal effect, when It was permissible and possible, and the motive for it was to achieve a public interest.