الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic idiopathic disease affecting the gastrointestinal tract that is comprised of two separate, but related intestinal disorders; Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The diagnosis of IBD is most commonly made on the basis of clinical features mentioned above in combination with findings on ultrasonography, endoscopy and histopathology. Apart from endoscopic interventions, readily attainable costeffective biomarkers for IBD assessment are required. The NLR is a cost-effective, common, and simple biomarker. According to recent studies, the NLR may be a new promising marker of the disease severity in IBD. However, the data on NLR and its association with other inflammatory serum markers are not convincing. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to evaluate the NLR as simple rapid and cheap test readily available for assessment of severity of IBD findings of ultrasonography and colonoscopy. This is a cross-sectional prospective observational study. This study included 40 IBD patients (19 females and 21 males), presented to Internal Medicine department, El-Demerdash Hospital, Ain Shams University from June 2018 to June 2019. Summary 95 Patients were matched with 10 healthy subjects (7 females and 3 males) as a control group. The diagnosis of IBD was established based on previous endoscopic, clinical, and pathological features. Furthermore, 10 healthy individuals who had no IBD based on their previous colonoscopy reports were included as a control group. All patients subjected to the following: Thorough medical history, clinical examination (general and local) and laboratory investigations including complete blood count with calculation of neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio, ESR and CRP on the day of the colonoscopic procedure. US examination and endoscopic examination were done for every patient. Statsitical analysis of our findings revealed following data: Mean value of NLR in IBD patients was significantly higher than those in control group representing 3.12±1.87 and 1.88±0.42 respectively but it was statisitically insignificant between active and inactive IBD patients with best cut off >2,01 to differentiate active from inactive patient.THE NLR value was correllating with CRP only with no correlation with ESR,NLR value also has association with US findings that suggesting activity with best cut off >2.5 to detect these findings by US in active patients.US has high sensitivity and specificity in Summary 96 discriminating patients with moderate and severe activity from those with mild activity or those in remission but it was unable to discriminate patient of moderate activity from patients with severe activity with strong assossiation with endoscopic scores of activity |