Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Patients with Bronchial Asthma: Effect of Self Management Program on Knowledge, Practice, and Self Efficacy /
المؤلف
Ahmed, Hanaa Farahat Ibrahim.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Hanaa Farahat Ibrahim Ahmed
مشرف / Salwa Samir Ahmed
مشرف / Ola Abdel Aty Ahmed
مناقش / Ola Abdel Aty Ahmed
تاريخ النشر
2019.
عدد الصفحات
217p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
التمريض (متفرقات)
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية التمريض - تمريض جراحى
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

Abstract

Bronchial asthma is a defined as a chronic inflammatory disease of airways that causes airway hyper-responsiveness, mucosal edema, and mucus production. This inflammation leads to varying degree of airways obstruction, which characterized by recurrent episodes of asthma symptoms such as cough, chest tightness, chest wheezing, and dyspnea. Patients with bronchial asthma are at risk for complications such as, respiratory failure which is a life-threatening condition affect their quality of life asthma. Treatment of patients with bronchial asthma can vary from anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator asthma inhalers to oral medications to drugs delivered in a nebulizer or breathing machine. Poor adherence with asthma therapy is a major challenge in the long term management of chronic asthma. So it is important to explain to the patients the importance and purpose of taking the long term therapy regularly and actively, participate in their own care, nurses are involved in both acute and long term management of patients with bronchial asthma; they are in a position to offer support and direction to help them to change their unhealthy behavior.
Aim of the Study:
This study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate the effect of self management program on knowledge, practice and self efficacy for patients’ with bronchial asthma.
 Summary
Research Hypothesis:
It is hypothesized that the implementation of self management program will improve the knowledge, practice and self efficacy of patients with bronchial asthma.
Research design:
A quasi-experimental research design was used with pre-post & follow up assessment of outcomes.
Technical Design:
The technical design for the study include; setting of studied, subjects and tools for data collection.
A. Setting
This study was conducted at the chest outpatient clinic at El Kaser Al-Eini Hospital affiliated to Cairo University.
B. Subjects
Purposive samples of patients with bronchial asthma, at the previous setting it will be one group (pre, post and follow up) on identified criteria were recruited for this study sample.
C. Tools of data collection
Data for this study were collected using the following tools:
I- Patients’ Sociodemographic characteristics and Clinical Data
Sheet: An Arabic questionnaire sheet based on criteria selection for subjects was filled in by patients and by the
 Summary
researcher if the subject is illiterate. It was designed by the researcher to assess:
Part ( ): It deals with socio-demographic characteristics of the patient under study as regards; age, sex, level of education, social status, occupation, residence and family income and contain items.
Part ( ): It is related to patients past medical and family history related to bronchial asthma, duration of present illness, effect of current illness on patients’ work and medications prescription and adherence, grade of disease, factors precipitating, sign and symptoms, diagnostic tests and contains items.
Part ( ): It includes data about patient’s environment and contains items.
Part ( ): It includes data about follow up and contains items.
Part ( ): It includes data about patient’s habits as smoking, sporting, nutrition, and contains items.
II- Arabic questionnaire for patient’ knowledge developed by the researcher which includes assessment of patients’ knowledge related to definition of bronchial asthma, precipitating factors, diagnostic studies, clinical manifestation,
 Summary
complications, treatment and ways of control and prevention, action plan, importance of breathing exercise, and dietary instruction. The sheet constructed of ( ) items in form of closed-ended, multiple choice questions. Patients’ responses to knowledge questionnaire were checked with model answered and given point if correct and if incorrect. The points were summed up and converted into a percent score. The items of this sheet were constructed, by the researcher based on review of literature under the guidance of the supervisors.
Scoring system of knowledge: For each area of knowledge the scores of the items were summed-up and the total divided by the number of the items, giving a mean score for the part. These scores were converted into a percent score, and then means and standard deviations were computed. Knowledge was considered satisfactory if the percent score was or more.
III- Checklist to assess patients practices
These checklists aimed to assess patient’s practice regarding deep breathing: diaphragmatic, pursed lip breathing, how to use incentive spirometry, nebulizer and inhaler therapy. It was adopted from (Lewis, et al., ; Berman & Nosek, ). These checklists were used for program assessment and post
 Summary
program evaluation. It consists of Performance assessment checklists covering the following areas:
Using a metered-dose inhaler, consists of steps, scores marks, using a dry powder inhaler , consists of steps, marks, administering nebulizer therapy, consists of steps, marks, performing breathing exercises, consists of steps, marks, how to use spirometer, consists of steps, marks.
Scoring system: Accordingly, subjects were given point if the step was correctly done and zero if not done or incorrect. The points were summed up and converted into a percent score. A total score of or higher was considered adequate practice.
IV- Self Efficacy Scale
It is adapted from Lorig et al. ( ) and modified by the researcher the scale constructed of items.
Scoring system of Self Efficacy:
The Self Efficacy scale was scored on a continuous scale from ” ” or not at all confident to “ ” or totally confident The scores of the items were summed-up and the total divided by the number of the items, giving a mean score. These scores were expressed in means and standard deviations the higher the score, the improvement.