Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Evaluation of the Effect of Honey on Liver Function Tests in group of Patients with Hepatitis A./
المؤلف
Maree, Hany Mansour.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Hany Mansour Maree
مشرف / Mamdouh Abd EL-Maksoud Mohamed
مشرف / Rania Hamed Shatla
تاريخ النشر
2014.
عدد الصفحات
149 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
طب الأطفال ، الفترة المحيطة بالولادة وصحة الطفل
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2014
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - طب الأطفـال
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

Abstract

This study was conducted in 4 weeks duration on 50 children and adolescents with acute hepatitis A infection treated with traditional therapy divided into two groups each group included 25 patients.
group A (Intervention group) included 25 patients who received a calculated daily dose of honey 3ml/kg/day for 4 weeks to explore the effect of its intake on clinical outcome and laboratory liver function tests .
group B (Non-Intervention group) included 25 patients who did not receive honey for the 4 weeks of the study to examine whether the change was due to honey ingestion or not.
The patients were recruited from the regular attendants of the children in the out-patients Pediatric Clinic of Ain Shams University Hospital.
All patients were subjected to:
1. Full history taking including time of illness.
2. Data from each patient’s file was accurately recorded as regards there is another chronic diseases.
3. Honey was given in a daily oral dose of 3 ml/kg for 4 weeks according to the protocol of each group.
4. Thorough clinical examination.
5. Follow up procedures were performed at enrollment, 2weeks and 4 weeks of the study including:
• clinical assessment to every patient: (vital signs, fever, vomiting, liver tenderness, jaundice, dark urine, light colored stool, constipation, diarrhea, decreased appetite and splenomegally).
• Lab finding: (AST, ALT, GGT, TOTAL BILLRUBIN and DIRECT BILLRUBIN). At week 0, week 2 and week 4 .
And we found that:
 Our study included 50 patients (24male, 26 female) with acute hepatitis A infection. They were divided into 2 groups, the Intervention group (group 1) and the non intervention group- (group 2). On comparing baseline studied variables between them, there were no statistical significant differences as regard baseline characteristics of patients.
 There were statistically decrease in number of patients with decreased appetite in intervention group compared to non intervention group at week 2.
 Study show that liver tenderness, jaundice and low grade fever statistically lowered in intervention group at week2.
 Study show that: no statistical significant difference between symptoms (decrease appetite, jaundice, low grade fever) in non intervention group (same group) between week 0 and week2, while there is significant decrease in symptoms (decrease appetite, jaundice, low grade fever) in intervention group (same group) between week 0 and week2.
 There is statistical significant decrease during week 2 in liver enzyme AST and total and direct billrubin in intervention group compared to non intervention group .
 There is statistical significant decrease during week 4 in total and direct billrubin, AST, ALT&GGT liver enzymes in intervention group compared to non intervention group with p < 0.005 .
 Study show that : There is statistical significant decrease in percent % of decrease in liver enzyme (AST) between week 0 to week 2 time in intervention group compared to non intervention group with p<0.005 .
 There is statistical significant decrease in percent % of decrease in total billrubin between week 0 to week 2 time in intervention group compared to non intervention group with p<0.005.
 There is statistical significant decrease in percent % of decrease in direct billrubin between week 0 to week 2 time in intervention group compared to non intervention group with p<0.005.
 There is statistical significant decrease in percent % of decrease in liver enzyme (ALT) between week 0 to week 4 time in intervention group compared to non intervention group with p<0.005 .
 There was no statistical significant difference between 2 groups at duration of illness.
 There is statistical significant decrease at recovery time in intervention group compared to non intervention group with p = .000.