Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Retroperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic approach for Management of Upper Ureteric Stones \
المؤلف
El-Fiky, Mohamed Emad El-saied.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / محمد عماد السيد الفقى
مشرف / وائل على ماجد
مشرف / محمد قطب طلبة
مناقش / وائل على ماجد
تاريخ النشر
2019.
عدد الصفحات
152 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
جراحة المسالك البولية
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - المسالك البولية
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 152

from 152

Abstract

Current options for ureteral stones include medical treatment, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), and various endoscopic procedures, with the standard open ureterolithotomy being less frequently practiced nowadays. The use of laparoscopy in the management of ureteral stones was one of the earliest applications of laparoscopy in urology, the first report being made by Wickham in 1979. In this study we present our experience with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy comparing both transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach through a prospective randomized comparative study.
Through our study we concluded that Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is technically feasible and safe and both of its two approaches either transperitoneal or retroperitoneal are successful procedures with a success rate nearly the same in both techniques, but and based on our results through this study, we recommend the retroperitoneal approach for laparoscpic extraction of the ureteral stones due to the fact that it has the least operative time than the transperitoneal approach, getting rid of the all stone burden, lower rate of complications and a better postoperative recovery.