الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract To this day, hepatitis C virus infection represents a global burden. The long term impact of HCV infection is highly variable, ranging from minimal effects to severe extra-hepatic complications. The goal of therapy is to eradicate HCV and in light of the advances in HCV therapy, simplification of diagnosis confirmation, pre-treatment diagnostic workup and treatment monitoring is required to ensure broad access to these new therapies. HCV RNA monitoring using NAATs with a lower detection level of 15 IU/ml is the gold standard for defining sustained virologic response after DAA treatment. Yet it is an expensive and time-consuming assay which raises the need to establish cheaper assays without compromising reliability. HCV core antigen quantification might be a valid alternative. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of HCV core antigen in defining a sustained virologic response, and its predictive value as a monitoring test in the course of treatment, by comparing it to the standard of care monitoring with a quantitative PCR test in patients who receive DAA regimens. This prospective study was conducted on 90 chronic HCV infected patients that have received DAA treatment.Overall the HCV core antigen assay demonstrated a cut off value of 0.71 pg/ml, a test sensitivity of 63.6 %, specificity of 98.7 %, PPV of 98.6 % and NPV of 89.3 %. The accuracy of the test was 90.5 %. A strong correlation between the logarithmic values of HCV RNA and HCV Ag had been observed. It was possible to calculate that 1 pg/ml of total HCV core Ag is equivalent to approximately 8,000 HCV RNA IU/ml and the calculated cut off value of our study of 0.71 pg/ml is consequently equivalent to approximately 6000 IU/ml. In summary, total HCV core Ag quantification is an accurate and precise indirect marker of replication in HCVinfected patients. Total HCV core antigen quantification can be used in various settings in which there is a need to monitor viral load, although clinically relevant decision thresholds need to be established in prospective clinical trials. A new assay with better sensitivity relying on chemiluminescent assay rather than enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or enzyme immunoassay is now being tested by various researches with outstanding results as compared to ELISA kits. |