الفهرس 
المقدمةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 219 |  |  |
| | | from | 219 | | |
المستخلص
The question of the means and the begging to fill the Islamic thought of old and recent, and was taking supporters among them and opponents, either supporters are evidence of the evidence conveyed by the Prophet, the Messenger of God explicit verses of Quran in the pleasing general concept does not allocate it, And the correct conceptions, which are far from being entangled and insulting, as fundamentalists say. Those who support the means do not believe in the independence of the person who begged them to act without God, and at the same time, the qualities, good deeds and blessed acts of the prophets and the guardians to Allah (Allah’s Exalted be He), which Allaah has given them to be honored and permitted by the path of sharia for them. The truth, may God bless him and grant him peace, is the one in the self, the attributes and the deeds, as the scholars of the faith say, while they see the means as a metaphor for one actor who has the real reason. He is Allah, and yet they see other Muslims as polytheists, Understanding of the legal texts including whales from A book and a year, sorry for accusing them of polytheism, veneration, falsification, and atonement, and they believe in begging Allaah to do what they love and do not deny something of the project. As for the opposition, they have lost their understanding of the meanings of the language and the legal texts of the book and the Sunnah, which limit the concept of begging to beg for the names of God and His attributes, good works and the prayer of the Prophet in his life as well as the righteous. They accuse the people of faith who are steadfast in the purity of the Prophets and the Righteous. A clear and true evidence testifies to what they claim, and they relied on ways to infer the validity of their words from their point of view, and here we remind them of Total : First, they weaken the hadiths that are correct in this case if they do not report the amount of money on the hadeeth and the ruling on it, knowing that the innovators were appointed to correct and weaken the hadeeths of the hadiths long ago in Islam. This has been done with the consensus of the nation in ancient and modern times. In the introduction of new rules in our time or in others, and did not inform one of the lowest degree of modern critics, the degree of conservation, which is surrounded by his knowledge of a hundred thousand modern (as explained in the continental continental elite thinking). I have corrected these hadeeths, citing the scholars of the scholars and the modern scholars. Second: they reject the correct ahaadeeth which is a corrupt interpretation that is consistent with their own desires. Thirdly: they ask the correct interpretations that have been received from those who are steadfast in the science of Hadith aside, and even criticize the imams in a manner that is inappropriate to them. They accuse them of either limiting the understanding or openly condemning them for the error of saying that they are reducing their understanding to them alone. Which is in the folds of research.