الفهرس 
المقدمة
تعريف الدفاع الشرعى وأحكامهيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 223 |  |  |
| | | from | 223 | | |
المستخلص
All heavenly religions came and even the dawn of Islam calls for adjusting the use of force only within the limits prescribed by God Almighty, Islam is to stop the war antibody position; because it is contrary to his teachings; forbidding war in all its forms, but it is authorized in one case, namely, self-defense case . I’ve had to resort to war is legitimate before 1945, and a means acceptable to settle disputes between nations, and as a result of tension that at the time the world has witnessed tried these covenants regulate and restrict this right without access to such an extent prohibited categorically and so we say: The principle of the prohibition of the use of force in relations international has found actually consecrate him through the charter of the United Nations, only to say that this view does not mean recognition of the principle upon its release, each exception rule, which crystallized in the text of Article 51 of the charter.
The question that arises in this regard is: what may be cases where the use of force in international relations in both Islamic law and international criminal law? Is that an attack is imminent, or exposure of the country to attacks from armed groups serve as an excuse to override the principle of preventing use of force in international relations and considered as an exception to the general rule in prevention?
To answer this problem we follow in our present several methods, mainly represented in the curriculum of monitoring the evolution of the concept of power before the reign of league down to the charter of the United Nations and the approach analytical helped us in the search in the views of scholars, and approach extrapolated exposure of legal texts relevant to the international conventions, and what is stable in Islamic law.