الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Bronchial asthma is the most frequent chronic disease in children. Epidemiological data suggest that in some countries the frequency and severity of its course, especially in children, has been increasing. Asthma, like any other chronic disease contributes to the deterioration of quality of life and may impair child’s development. Bronchial asthma is related to a high morbidity rate, leading to an increased frequency of emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and poor scholastic performance in addition to the physical, psychological, and social impact. BA mortality and morbidity are still unacceptably high due to lack of knowledge, perception, and skills of mothers who provide care for their children. Management of asthma requires open communication and cooperation between child, family and all health team who provide care for this child, so, the child can lead a relatively normal life. The present study was aiming to assess effect of discharge plan on school aged children having bronchial asthma. This aim was achieved through assessing the common physical and psychological and social problems perceived by the children having asthma, Constructing and implementing a discharge plan for children having asthma and evaluating the effect of discharge plan on children having asthma. The subjects and methods of the current study are discussed under the following designs: V- Technical design VI- Operational design VII- Administrative design VIII- Statistical design I-Technical design: Technical design includes; the research design, setting, subjects and tools for data collection. Research Design: A quasi-experimental study design was utilized in carrying out this study. Settings: The study was conducted at Emergency Department and Outpatient Clinic in Children Hospital affiliated to Ain Shams University Hospitals. Subjects: A purposive sample was compromised of (86) school aged children were attending with their mothers to the previously mentioned settings. Under the following inclusion criteria: Age from 6-12years. Both genders. Confirmed diagnosis of being bronchial asthma. Exclusive Criteria: Children with cystic fibrosis and other chest diseases. Tools of data collection Data were collected through the following tools. 1- An Interviewing Questionnaire: (Appendix I) It was designed by the researcher after reviewing related literatures and it was translated into Arabic Language. It was comprised from three parts: Part one: It was concerned with children and their mothers’ demographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, residence, mother characteristics. Part two: It was concerned with children health history such as duration of asthma, previous hospitalization and family history related to bronchial asthma.Part three: It was concerned with children and their mothers’ knowledge regarding to definition of bronchial asthma, signs symptoms, causes, trigger factors, complications, and management. Scoring System: The questions about children and their mothers’ knowledge were given scored two marks for the correct answer, one mark for the incomplete answer and Zero for the incorrect answer. According to children and their mothers’ answer, their knowledge was categorized into unsatisfactory knowledge < 75% and satisfactory knowledge ≥ 75%. 2- Quality of life (QOL) Scale: (Appendix II) It was adopted from Varni et al., (2008) and modified and by researcher to assess children QOL. Scoring System: This part deal with assessment of the children QOL, it consisted of five aspects of QOL. The statement of each aspect checked as ―always‖, almost, ―sometimes‖, rarer or ―never‖. An always go zero score, almost go one score, sometimes go two score, rarer go three score and never go four score. The total score for this part was twenty four marks vided as the following; - Physical aspect: five statements 20 marks. - Psychological aspect: six statements 24 marks. - Emotional aspect: seven statements 28 marks. - Social aspect: four statements 16 marks. - School aspect: six statements 24 marks. - According to the children answer, their quality of life (QOL) was categorized into good quality of life < 75% and ≥ 75% a poor quality of life. 3- An Observation Checklist (Appendix III) It was adopted from El- Hawashy et al., (1997) and it was used to assess self-care practices. It included hygiene care, safety measure, regular outpatient clinic follow up and training for treatment regimen. Children practices classified into dependent <75% and independent ≥ 75%. 4- Discharge Planning: (Appendix x) The discharge planning constructed by the researcher according to needs assessment of the children having bronchial asthma. It was designed as a booklet in simple Arabic Language to suit the children and their mothers and guided by illustrated pictures and figures. It was included knowledge about management plan which should befollowed regularly and the practices for drugs dosage calculation and usage of nebulizer. Content of booklet (Discharge Planning) The booklet included some information about; Theoretical background for asthma, (definition, types of asthma, causes, healthy and unhealthy characters for asthma). Care of asthma (self care, safety measures, medication administration & nebulizer). Questions commonly asked by the children with asthma (Doctors visited, Medication, Sports\ Exercises). Trigger factors producing asthma. Complication of asthma. V. Operational Design: Preparatory phase A review of the past and current related literature covering various aspects of the discharge for children having bronchial asthma, using books, articles, periodicals, and magazines to get acquainted with the research problem to develop the study tools. Content Validity and Reliability Testing validity of the proposed tools by inspecting the items to determine whether the tools measure what supposed to measure. The stage developed by a jury of 7 experts from different academic categories (professors and assistant professors) of the medical –surgical nursing at the faculty of nursing, Ain Shams University. The expertise reviewed the tools for clarity, relevance, comprehensiveness, simplicity and minor modification was done. Testing reliability of the proposed tools was done statistically by Cronbach alpha test. Pilot study The pilot study was carried out on 10% of total subject size of children and their mothers to test the applicability and to evaluate the content validity of the study tools. Results of the pilot study helped to make modifications on the tools; some items of questionnaire were modified and unnecessary were omitted. It takes about one month from the end of November 2013. The children and their mothers in the pilot study were excluded from the study sample. Ethical Considerations: The ethical research considerations in this study included the following: The research approval obtains before discharge plan implementation. The researcher clears the objective and aim of the study to subjects. The researcher maintain on anonymity and confidentiality of subjects. Subjects are allowed to choose to participate or not participate, and they have right to withdraw from a study any time without penalty. Field work: The actual field work for data collection for has consumed 6 months started on January 2014 up to the end of June 2014 for collection data and two weeks later for follow up started after implementation of each session of the program through: 4 sessions with one session for formative assessment to show the children condition and one session for filling the questionnaire before discharge and applied individual or groups for children. Children under study were selected on discharge and given booklet about discharge planning only ongoing discharge phase.The researcher collected the data during the morning shifts in Emergency Department in El-Demerdach Hospital, at two days each week. The children assessment sheet was filled by the researcher based on child condition on through personal interview, within 30-40 minutes; the purpose of the study was explained to them. Child’s questionnaire sheet filled by children and their mothers as pre/post. To identify children and their mother’s knowledge about discharge planning after received booklet, without refer to textbooks or another resources, within 40- 50 minutes. For illiterate child, data were filled by the researcher through interview. The booklet of discharge planning was given to children and their mothers. The researcher explained the purpose of the study for every child, clarified each item in the booklet, and any item needing practice was explained and demonstrated; observation of media about (self care and administration of medication) in the booklet and real media (supplies of a nebulizer) in hospital, together answered any questions related to disease or it is complication for children and their mothers to reduce fear and anxiety, within the schedule of program.The observation checklists for self & administration of medication were filled by the researcher on ongoing discharge phase within 20 -30 minute. The QOL Scale for children having asthma was filled by children before received program and booklet, within 30- 40 minutes. For illiterate children it was filled by the researcher. During follow up, the children had filled QOL Scale again in outpatient clinic and the observation checklists for self & administration of medication were filled by the researcher. VI. Administrative design: To carry out the study, the necessary approval was obtained from the Hospital Director and Nursing Director in El- El-Demerdach Hospital, explaining the aim of study to obtain the permission for data collection. A letter was issued to them from the Faculty of Nursing affiliated to Ain Shams University Hospitals. VII. Statistical design: Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20. Data were presented using descriptive statistics in the form of frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables, means and standard deviation for quantitative variables, qualitative variables were compared using chi-square test and quantitative variables, qualitative variables were compared using paired T test. Significance of results: Non significant (NS) if P> 0.05 Significant (S) if P< 0.05 High significant (HS) if P<0.01 |