Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PANRETINAL
PHOTOCOAGULATION VERSUS COMBINED PANRETINAL
PHOTOCOAGULATION AND INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB
INJECTION IN TREATMENT OF PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC
RETINOPATHY\
المؤلف
Zaid, Nour El-Din Hussein Abu.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Nour El-Din Hussein Abu Zaid
مشرف / Magdy Mohamed El-Barbary
مناقش / Tarek Ahmed El-Mamoun
مناقش / Mohamed Abd El-Hakim Zaki
تاريخ النشر
2014.
عدد الصفحات
122p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
طب العيون
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2014
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - جراحة عيون
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 16

from 16

Abstract

Panretinal photocoagulation is a well-known principal
therapy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Although PRP
reduces the possibility of severe visual loss, it has several side
effects, such as macular edema, constricted visual field and laserinduced
vitreous hemorrhage. Also, additional laser therapy or
surgical intervention has been necessary after PRP performance.
Recent reports have shown that VEGF plays a key role in
neovascularization of the eye, and that intravitreal anti-VEGF
injection can lead to regression of neovessels.
Anti-VEGF is effective when PRP is not possible; also
when neovascular glaucoma develops after full PRP. However, we
experienced unfavorable adverse events after injection of
bevacizumab.
Both PRP alone and bevacizimab augmented PRP are
effective in regression of neovessels with no evident difference in
BCVA , size of neovessels or central macular thickness over 12
week follow up period except that bevacizumab augmented PRP
gives faster effect in decreasing the size of neovessels however
this effect is short term.
Therefore, intravitreal bevacizumab injection may be
performed with caution until its long- term effects and safety are
confirmed in future.