الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on a review of the literature, MCE is the gold standard for the diagnosis of no-reflow, followed by coronary angiography. One of the best ways to decrease the incidence of no-reflow is to reduce infarct size by early revascularization and adequate pharmacological treatment. Treatment with acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and statins before PCI reduce periprocedural myocyte damage and should be prescribed when possible. The use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in acute coronary syndrome provides additional microvascular protection and improves clinical outcomes. Various pharmacological interventions and catheter devices to retrieve embolic materials were proposed, but until now, none of them have been adopted as the treatment of choice because of the variable success rates. Distal embolic protection has not resulted in improved microvascular flow or function, or reduction of infarct size or event-free survival. Randomized studies do not support routine use of thrombectomy devices with primary PCI in all STEMI patients for the reduction of major adverse cardiac event rates. Effective removal of thrombi using the AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy system before stenting may reduce distal embolization of thrombus, which could improve myocardial perfusion and salvage. Several studies have shown that postconditioning reduced myocardial infarct size by 36% and improved myocardial perfusion; however, the effect of ischemic postconditioning on clinical outcomes remains to be determined. It is difficult to recommend the routine use of adenosine or other vasodilators to prevent noreflow in acute coronary syndrome patients or in other groups undergoing PCI based on the current available evidence. However, should no-reflow occur following PCI, treatment with intracoronary adenosine or verapamil should be administered because this therapy is inexpensive and safe, improves flow in the target vessel and may reduce infarct size. Postconditioning, beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are other techniques or pharmacological drugs with encouraging results, but further large randomized controlled trials are required to resolve this issue. In our point of view, the superiority of verapamil with sodium nitroprusside in achieving better successful reperfusion criteria as assessed by Echo and angiographic data (MBG) mostly because in addition to verapamil effect, sodium nitroprusside was associated with significant improvements in coronary flow, with an increase being seen in TIMI flow and myocardial blush grade(MBG). Also patients with positive family history and dyslypidemics had a higher affinity to develop no reflow compared to other patients. |