الفهرس 
التمهيد:تطور قضية القناةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 380 |  |  |
| | | from | 380 | | |
المستخلص
Since the Suez Canal opened to navigate in 1869, wounded in the Egyptian national sense – because it represents a state within the state – this problem didn’t finish until the nationalization decision, announced by the president Gamal Abdelnasser on the 26th July, 1956.
The policies that Abdelnasser adopted, led to withdraw funding west for High Dam project, which represent one of the elements that push Abdelnasser to take the nationalization decision.
The nationalization was after study prior to Gamal Abdelnasser, this decision include the international company of the Suez Canal, such decision had not been subjected to the freedom of navigation in the canal according to Constantinople Convention 1888 which was valid until the Egyptian government decree on the 24th, April 1957.
This nationalization didn’t violate the law of the nationalization law, especially after compensating the shareholders and owners of the shares of establishment with the last closing price of establishment prior to the date of this law on the stock exchange in Paris.
The Suez Canal id Egyptian in accordance with the convention on the 22nd February 1866 as stated in the first item of the article 16 on the canal company is Egyptian company subjects to the laws and customs of the state.
The nationalization turns from the nationalization of Egyptian company into international company controlled in oriented it the political relations between states. The Indian and Soviet Union positions are for Egypt’s support and refused establishing the international body that assumes the navigation in the canal.
The three conferences of London were aimed to the internationalization of the Canal and taken the Canal away controlling of the Egyptian government, but the idea of internalization didn’t achieve for which was held, the most important reasons for the failure of the three conferences didn’t achieve any thing, as a result of dispute in the objectives and policies between the united states from one side and Britain and France from another side.
The United Nation had a role in trying to reach an agreement; the six principles are resulting from the UN to satisfy all parties, except England and France which were planning to aggression and is preparing to occupy Egypt.
They used the nationalization as a pretext to eliminate the provision of Nassery anti-western policy. The tripartite aggression in which a clear violation of treaties and international conventions and the faithful out to be bound by six principles that were agreed at the UN. As a result of the international stance in Egypt’s support the aggression failed to achieve its objective, but England and France turned into trademarks, ended their imperial age. The United States interfered in the Middle East, inherited the role of Western Europe in the region, the most important results of the Suez crisis increased the Arab unity and solidarity among Arab and people governments, the beginning of the Cold War between the Untied States and the Soviet Union and change the political map in the world....