Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
ابن الخياط الدمشقي :
المؤلف
فراج, فراج جوده.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / فراج جوده فراج
مشرف / الطاهر أحمد مسكي
مناقش / الطاهر أحمد مسكي
مناقش / الطاهر أحمد مسكي
الموضوع
الشعراء العرب. التراجم الأدبية.
تاريخ النشر
1981م.
عدد الصفحات
286ص. ؛
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
الأدب والنظرية الأدبية
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/1981
مكان الإجازة
جامعة بنها - كلية الاداب - لغة عربية
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 256

from 256

المستخلص

This thesis is entitled:
” Ibn el lillayyCltLldemashqi, his life and
poetry”. He YTaS one of the faEl0u$ poets durine
the second half of the fifth century of higrah •.
He was born in Damascus, year 450 H. and gro~n up
in it • He trcvelecl to: Hamah , eastrn Tarabuls ,
then returned to Damascus year 487 H, where he
died year 517 H.
Our thesis had bean divided into two parts:
the first ~~ includes two chapters, ol~pter one
talks about the era of the poet , political,. socicl
and cultural features. The.Lbbasid caliphate in
BaGhcled in that tine had become very weak, with
no authority. This played a role in the dividing
of the AU6asid state and enerGency of sInll
governorats. This led to bloody wars and conflicts
for hold of authority.
The society in that time consisted of two
main classes: the first class was prosperous vn”ich
included, caliphate, rulers, Dinisters etc. The
second class was suffering froD poverty and Lusery,
this cless represented the majority - Ibn el IChayyat
belonged to those.
On the other hQnd, there was an excellent
literary and scientific revivQl.
In chapter two I talked about the poet’s life
his name , fmrl.ly , culture, travels and deo.th.
Part two consisted of three chapters. In
chapter one I studiecl his differeat poetic arts,
I proved that the praising WL1S the first in his
poetry, because he racd e this art as 0. ’!layto eab
his living.
/
In chapter two I reviewed his poetic language
und clicion. I showed that his meaninGs in general
forLl were good and clear, o.ndthat his language
and dieion were siople, clear and has no strangeness.
On the other heme’ , I tallceelo.bout the
literu.ry form and the emotion also I studied the
poetics in his poems. (B~~r el Taweel) was the
dominant of 0.11 and his ~msic, rhythns and rhymes
vvere very good in uost of his poetry.
In chapter three I exposed the opinions of
the old and modern historians in our poet. In the
conclusion I stated the results and somL~ry.
I hope what I have done can help in reviewinG
our great arab heritage. Thanks for hllah.