Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
ميتافيزيقا الحدوث بين الاتجاهين الماهوي والوجودي في الفلسفة الإسلامية ( الميرداماد والشيرازى نموذجاً ) :
المؤلف
السعيد، هشام احمد محمد ابراهيم.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / هشام احمد محمد ابراهيم السعيد
مشرف / عادل محمود عمر بدر
مناقش / عادل محمود عمر بدر
باحث / هشام احمد محمد ابراهيم السعيد
الموضوع
الفلسفة الإسلامية. الفلسفة الإسلامية - تاريخ.
تاريخ النشر
2008.
عدد الصفحات
222 ص. ؛
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
فلسفة
تاريخ الإجازة
01/01/2008
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية الآداب - فلسفة
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 244

from 244

المستخلص

Lobo the system – the essential and the existential negate the precedence of each other. where the essentialists that essence is precedent to existence or insist on its originality while the existentialists insist on the contrary. But the both came up to a common output contingence yet the disagree as to the definition of such contingence but it remain the same in its inwardness and its out wordiness, and this indicated the oneness of reality in lieu of diversity among the means conduce to it, and despite the disharmony they are the end limite to each other. Non of each can be defined but by the mean of other and implied the integrity of knowledge in spite of its multiplicity and diversity of its components . As if we were before a type of dialectic which include the theme and the anti theme or the theme is one thing. The conflict in fact between the two systems: The essential and the existential: consist in: who would fill up the outward vacuum and up on it all outside can sequences depend the essential or the existential? This is the care of the conflict between them, when the some reality fill up the vacuum. The originality become to the exist and vesversa . The proponents of the two systems from this point tried to put forth their arguments which prove its precedence, moreover the history of Philosophy until the time of El Shirazi, support the essential beginning with the theologians El Phrabi Avicenna passed by El Sharawardi and Ibn Arabi ended with Mirdamad. Al though El Shirazi agree with his mentor, at first that the originality was up to the essential, but changing his mind and disagreed with him later on opined that the originality is to the existential, was like the Copernican coup in the history of the is lamic Philosophy, Since with this new hypo thesis has added a positive dimension to the world view, Since thereby DROP all considerations ploy down the importance of the material existence, which deemed fancy and mirage a carding to the viewpoint of those who say of the originality of essence. The concept of time occupy a principal and a distinguished post, in the meaning of contingence, hence the meaning of contingence necessarily recall the idea of time, it pointing out that thing was nonexistence while other thing was exist in the same time. As for the non-contingent nothing precede it in existence so the time has nothing to do with his existence. Because his existence is incessant in any time, so nothing precede it in existence. (1) The temporal contingence. huduth Zhmoni – as the statement theologians. (2) The auto contingence. huduth Dahri as the statement of Avicenna. (3) (huduth Dahri) The eternal contingence. The statement Mirdomad . (4) (huduth Wjodi) The subslontial contingence. the statement of El Shirazi.