Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Evaluation of different post and core systems for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors /
المؤلف
Ahmed, Mohamed Elfatih Mansour Eltahir Mohame.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / محمدالفاتح منصور الطاهر محمد أحمد
مشرف / عبير مصطفى عبداللطيف
مشرف / إبراهيم حسن القلا
مشرف / أحمد حمدي وهبة
مناقش / سلوى محمد عوض
مناقش / محمد حسن مصطفى بخيت
الموضوع
Dentistry. Teeth - Diseases. Mouth - Care and hygiene.
تاريخ النشر
2024.
عدد الصفحات
online resource (103 pages) :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
طب الأسنان
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2024
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية طب الأسنان - طب أسنان الأطفال وصحة الفم
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 103

from 103

Abstract

Aim: This an in-vitro study was conducted to evaluate the fracture resistance of different post and core systems for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors.Methods: Forty extracted primary incisors were collected, prepared, and then obturated using Metapex. Teeth were then divided into four groups (N = 10/group). group 1: teeth restored with human dentin post & composite core; group 2: bovine dentin post & composite core; group 3: glass fiber posts & composite core; and group 4: orthodontic stainless steel wire in omega-form & composite core. Sound blocks of dentin were obtained from the roots of the extracted human and bovine teeth to fabricate the dentin posts. These blocks were milled by a special bur in the computer numerical control milling machine (CNC). The posts were cemented using glass ionomer cement (GIC), followed by crown build-up with composite resin. For all samples, thermocycling was performed, and then the fracture resistance and mode of failure were examined.Results: This results revealed no significant difference between the four experimental groups regarding maximum compressive load and modes of failure.Conclusion: The Glass fiber posts and omega posts had higher fracture resistance than the human and bovine dentin posts, although all groups exhibited fracture resistance greater than the maximum bite force in children, indicating that they can be successfully utilized to restore severely damaged primary incisors.