الفهرس 
مقدمة الدراسةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 433 |  |  |
| | | from | 433 | | |
المستخلص
In this research, I studied and analyzed the topic: “The legal system for electoral campaigns.
(Comparative study)
This thesis aims to analyze all issues related to the electoral campaigns system for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France. Due to the emergence of cases of political corruption, which revealed the influence of money in political life, financing election campaigns has been a topic of discussion in many democracies. As a comparison between Egypt and France, they are two democracies with somewhat similar electoral systems, and these discussions attempt to show that the power of money can influence elections, especially the elections for the President of the Republic rather than the elections for Parliament.
Accordingly, this research aims to analyze the content of electoral campaigns for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France, which aims to identify the nature of electoral propaganda, and address the conditions for candidacy for the Presidency of the Republic and membership of Parliament in both Egypt and France, in addition to clarifying the controls for electoral campaigns in both Egypt. And France, and showing the means and methods of electoral campaigns in both Egypt and France.
Finally, knowing the ways to monitor the financing of electoral campaigns and the penalties imposed for violating the provisions of electoral campaigns in both Egypt and France.
The descriptive analytical approach and the comparative approach were used in order to describe the legal system for electoral propaganda, which is represented in the nature of electoral campaigns and the conditions for running for the position of President of the Republic in Egypt and France, and to describe the controls of electoral propaganda, its means and financing, and the penalties prescribed for violating its provisions, and in order to draw a comparison between Egyptian and French law regarding the legal regulation of electoral propaganda, this approach shows the similarities and differences regarding the legal system of electoral campaigns as a comparative study between Egypt and France.
The study was divided into an introductory section to review the various definitions that were subject to electoral propaganda, their characteristics and their distinction from others, as well as the conditions for running for presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France.
After the introduction, we dealt with the thesis through two sections, and we divided each section into two sections. In the first section, we dealt with the controls and means of electoral propaganda. Through the first section, we touched upon the clarification of the controls for electoral campaigns for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France, whether the financing controls or the regulatory controls for electoral campaigns in both countries, and we showed the financing and organization of propaganda. Election campaign for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France, such as investigating funding sources and spending limits for electoral campaigns for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France, in addition to explaining the controls for regulating the timing of electoral campaigns and its prohibitions for the presidential and parliamentary elections in both countries, such as the timing of campaigns and the prohibitions of electoral campaigns methods.
In the second section, we studied the oversight of the financing of electoral campaigns for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France and the penalties imposed for violating its provisions, which we divided into two sections, where we devoted the first chapter to explaining the oversight of the financing of electoral campaigns for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Egypt and France by clarifying and explaining the rules for financing electoral campaigns for the presidential elections. And parliamentarism in both countries and the obligations of candidates in financing electoral campaigns, in addition to monitoring the financing of electoral campaigns through oversight bodies and showing the practical features and scope of oversight of electoral campaigns controls for both countries.
As for the second chapter of the same section, we finally discussed the penalties prescribed for violating the provisions of electoral campaigns by stating and clarifying the violations and penalties prescribed for violating the provisions of electoral campaigns and classifying those violations through the penalty for violating the provisions on financing and the penalty for violating the provisions regulating electoral propaganda.
The most important results were the following:
• The introduction of laws governing the financing and organization of electoral campaigns into the legal systems of the two countries, Egypt and France, was to consolidate the final foundations for regulating electoral campaigns and financing elections, whether presidential or parliamentary, in both countries.
• French legislation paid attention to the electoral campaign, so it limited the parties that finance it, set a ceiling for electoral expenses according to the number of populations, and prevented legal entities from financing the campaign, with the exception of political parties, in order to guarantee the principle of equality and equal opportunities. French legislation prohibited the use of fake news. Or malicious rumors or fraudulent means to influence voters.
• The French legislator paid attention to the places allocated for advertising, the colors of banners and their display, and the duration specified for electoral advertising. It seems that this difference in interest is due to the electoral experience of each of the two countries, in addition to the differences in the purposes of each of the legislators in the two countries under study.
• Egyptian and French legislation dealt with regulating the issue of financing presidential and parliamentary election campaigns through special texts and through the texts of electoral systems.
As for the recommendations and proposals that I reached, the most important of them were the following:
• Finding a way to regulate the financial affairs of elections by achieving more transparency in political life, and by rebuilding citizens’ confidence in politicians and politics.
• Expanding the authority of the Constitutional Council and the National Elections Authority in the field of monitoring the electoral campaign.
• We call on the Egyptian legislator to establish a legal system for organizing political public opinion polls, especially since through public opinion polls popular participation will be strengthened and citizens pushed away from negativity, especially when private institutions and institutes are established that undertake the task of organizing public opinion polls.
In conclusion, I ask God Almighty to benefit from this study and that it represents an important addition to researchers and the scientific library.