Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
MSCT Versus MRI In Decision Making For
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases /
المؤلف
Abdelbaky, Ahmad Amer Hamdy,
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Ahmad Amer Hamdy Abdelbaky
مشرف / Essam Khalaf Allah Khalifa El-Sherif
مشرف / Ahmed Mohammed Shawky
مناقش / Amr Abdel Halim Amr
مناقش / Muhammad Jamal Hassan
الموضوع
Orthopedics. Traumatology.
تاريخ النشر
2024.
عدد الصفحات
95 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
الناشر
تاريخ الإجازة
4/9/2023
مكان الإجازة
جامعة أسيوط - كلية الطب - جراحة العظام
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 123

from 123

Abstract

The current study was conducted to assess differences in decision making in patients of lumbar degenerative spine based on CT vs. MRI. The study enrolled 30 patients. Mean age of the studied patients was 44.57 years with range between 20 and 73 years old. Majority of patients was males.
Lumbar canal stenosis and lumbar disc prolapse were found in 20 (66.7%) and 17 (56.7%) patients, respectively. Six patients had degenerative listhesis and only one patient had lumbar spondylosis. It was found that the surgeons had good degree of agreement as regard decision either based on CT (k degree= 90.3%, p< 0.001) or MRI (k degree= 96.8%, p< 0.001).
The main finding in the study was that MRI had better diagnostic assessment of patients with degenerative spine diseases. There was significant difference between surgeons’ decisions based on CT and that of based on MRI (p< 0.001). Conservation with follow up was reported in 6.7% and 7.3% of CT and MRI decisions, respectively. Up to 12% of CTs’ decisions were completely confirmed and required further evaluation with MRI.
In conclusion, MRI of the spine is a rapidly evolving modality. MRI is the first-line diagnostic tool for evaluation of spinal diseases particular those cases with degenerative spine diseases. Multiple centers future studies are warranted to confirm such findings.