الفهرس 
INTRODUCTIONOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 118 |  |  |
| | | from | 118 | | |
Abstract
• The difference of the Mean ±SD of bone density with magnetic mallet method was statistically significant by 224.9 ±118.6 preoperatively and 805.6 ±246.6 postoperative withmaximum preoperative density of 388 and postoperative density of 1150 (p value = 0.002).
• The control group with conventional drill system show a statistically significant increasein the postoperative bonedensitythan the preoperative density(721.0 ±127.5 versus 320.0 ±108.2) with maximum preoperative density of 550 and postoperative density of 829 (p value < 0.001).
• In osteotomy with magnetic mallet group, there is no patients had poor healing index while 28.6% and 71.4% of them had good and very good index respectively.
• Patients in osteotomywithconventionaldrill systemgroup had very good healing index
while 14.3% and 85.7% of them had poor and good index respectively.
• Implants done with magnetic mallet had a statistically significant higher primary
stability(74.43 ±4.28) than Implants done with drill system (67.43 ±5.91) with p value
= 0.026.
• Secondary stability was statistically significant higher in group A (82.86 ±3.80) than
Implants done in group B (72.71 ±9.52) with p value = 0.022.
• Buccal marginal bone loss washigher in control group than the interventiongroup with Mean ±SD of 1.46 ±2.24 and 1.30 ±1.09 respectively.
• Lingual marginal bone loss was higher in control group than the intervention group with Mean ±SD of 1.47 ±1.98 and 0.90 ±0.84, respectively.