الفهرس 
IntroductionOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 123 |  |  |
| | | from | 123 | | |
Abstract
Summary There has been a sea change in surgical practise, with the introduction of operational video-laparoscopy replacing open surgery as the standard method. With its numerous advantages over open surgery, including faster wound healing, shorter hospital stays, less postoperative pain, and better cosmetic results, laparoscopic surgery has become a well-established choice for many gynaecological disorders. Ladies, particularly younger women, have a serious problem with postoperative scar cosmoses. Negative effects, including psychological fallout, could result from these scars. Scars may provide the same discomfort, soreness, and itching that a wound caused. With the improvement of surgical tools and methods, laparoscopy has recently seen a spike in demand as a scar-less surgical option. Because it is such a prominent part of the abdomen’s aesthetic, surgeons worry about ways to make the umbilicus seem normal again. Approximately half of the laparoscopic experts favoured the infra umbilical route for entrance, whereas 35.7% chose the supra umbilical region, according to a survey of laparoscopic practise. A recent research found that compared to transverse incisions, vertical incisions provide better cosmetic results. To determine the long-term scar effects of laparoscopic intraperitoneal access procedures, more study is necessary. For the majority of abdominal surgeries, laparoscopic surgery may provide better surgical results than traditional open surgery concerning the pain experienced after surgery, the amount of time spent in the hospital, the