![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a medical condition caused by abnormal trophoblastic invasion of the placental tissue into the uterine wall. Compared to a normal pregnancy, PAS is associated with an increased risk of maternal morbidities and higher rates of maternal death that result from the marked intraoperative hemorrhage occurring during its management. (Usta et al.2005) The worldwide increasing rate of caesarean deliveries is associated with a global rise in the incidence of PAS. Early diagnosis is the key for the appropriate management planning of this condition. Ultrasound is the gold standard diagnostic modality for PAS. Other radiological diagnostic tools may be of aid such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, definitive diagnosis can‘t be established without the intraoperative gross assessment of the placenta and its postoperative histopathological evaluation. (Boroomand Fard M et al.2020) Research significance PAS is usually managed by caesarean hysterectomy (CH) however; many uterine preservation techniques are recently tailored aiming at preserving the women‘s future fertility. Nevertheless, uterine preserving techniques are associated with higher risk for maternal morbidities and blood loss. In a hopeful attempt to lower the blood loss in uterine preserving surgery, we performed ligation of the anterior division of the internal iliac artery being the main blood supply to the pelvic organs. This was done as a result of the lack of complex resources as balloon occlusion of the IIA by intervention radiology, which is quite the case in most middle and low income countries. Patients and methods Aiming at studying the role of IIA ligation in lowering the estimated blood loss volume in conservative management of a variant of PAS; focal accretas and partial thickness invasion, 44 patients were enrolled in our study. Those patients were randomly divided into 2 groups; a study group –in which ligation of the anterior division of the internal iliac artery was done during their operation and a control group in which we didn‘t ligate the same vessel.Results: The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) after 24 hours in the study group is 1050.83 ± 401.57, while in the control group it is 1196.30 ± 414.25 showing no significant difference between both groups (p-value = 0.244). There was also no statistical significance regarding neither the operative morbidities nor the need for blood transfusion between both groups. Coming to operative time, there was no statistical significance between both groups. Nevertheless, its worth mentioning that the mean operative time for the study group is 133.64 ± 47.16 mins. while it is 111.36 ± 29.65 mins. for the control group -20 mins. longer operative time than the control group with a p-value of 0.069. Conclusion: Our study concluded that the ligation of the internal iliac artery isn‘t quite beneficial in lowering the estimated blood loss during the uterine preservation management in cases of focal placental adherence. Moreover, during this step, the operative time might be relatively longer and surgical complications might occur. IIAL shouldn‘t be a routine step in uterine preservation surgery in management of cases with morbidly adherent placenta and it should be preserved for cases with marked blood loss. However, pelvic surgeons should be familiar with the anatomy of the IIA and the technique for its proper ligation when needed. |