Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
valuation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Diagnosis of Solitary Thyroid Nodule :
المؤلف
Zaghloul, Pavly George Saad.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / بافلى جورج سعد زغلول
مشرف / محمود أحمد الشافعي
مشرف / منال ابراهيم محمد علي سالمان
مشرف / ايمن حسام الدين عبد المنعم
تاريخ النشر
2022.
عدد الصفحات
90 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
جراحة
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2022
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - الجراحة العامة
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 90

from 90

Abstract

Solitary thyroid nodule (STN) a solitary expanding in thyroid tissue that radiologically arises from the thyroid parenchyma. Clinically unmistakable nodule knowledgeable in about 4% of adult population, the use of imaging systems ultrasound; chance acknowledgment thyroid nodules has fundamentally expanded.
The pre-operative evaluation of thyroid nodule critically separates among harmless threatening nodule. FNAC highest quality level strategy in appraisal thyroid nodule; it depicted as fast, solid, financially savvy insignificantly obtrusive system. As indicated many examinations it has prompted critical lessening in surgeries of patients thyroid nodule; but it offers an expansion in level thyroid medical procedures harmful injuries
The point in this review was associate fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) histopathological evaluation in finding Solitary thyroid nodule.
In current review, 40 patients were involved. Everyone of them had a suggestive Solitary thyroid nodule, they went through pre-operative FNAC for thyroid nodule post-operatively histopathological evaluation extracted example, our outcomes shows that Solitary thyroid nodules happened all more regularly in females a proportion (M: F 1:7).
Most youthful patient was 18 years old and the most seasoned was 62 years old, Majority of patients’ age range from 40-50 years at show. 19 (47.5%) patients had right‑side nodule, while 21 (52.5%) patients had left‑side nodule.
FNAC results hangs out in present review Sensitivity (93.3%), Specificity (76%), Positive predictive value (70%), Negative predictive value (95%) Accuracy (82.5%).