الفهرس | يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام |
المستخلص Administrative discipline is one of the most important and accurate issues of public office. Discipline in itself is inherent in every social system, and reform is the message on which it is based, not just punishment. It does not aim at revenge or retribution from the employee, but rather its primary purpose is to ensure the regular and steady functioning of public utilities. The penalty is one of the administrative authority’s means to maintain the regular functioning of public utilities. Hence, the possibility of the administrative authority’s delinquency with the penalty is possible, as it possesses the authority to investigate and judge together. There must be guarantees enjoyed by the public employee that prevent the administration from misusing the attribution of the penalty (), which are These guarantees are to confront the employee with the accusation or charges against him, and to investigate with him to determine the nature of those charges and verify their validity.. Finally, enabling him to defend himself to refute those charges and provide evidence of his innocence. The principle of hearing the accused’s defense is one of the important and indispensable guarantees when conducting the investigation with the employee. For example, Article 98 of the Egyptian Constitution issued in 2014 states that “the right of defense in person or by proxy is guaranteed, and the independence of the lawyer and the protection of her rights is a guarantee to guarantee the right of defense. The law guarantees the financially incapable the means to resort to the judiciary, and to defend their rights.” |