Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Effect of different root canal irrigants on the bond strength of endosequence root repair material compared to mineral trioxide aggregate when used as furcation perforation repair :
الناشر
Samaa Mohammed Osman Mohammed ,
المؤلف
Samaa Mohammed Osman Mohammed
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Samaa Mohammed Osman Mohammed
مشرف / Randa Mohamed Elboghdady
مشرف / Geraldine Mohamed Ahmed
مشرف / Randa Mohamed Elboghdady
تاريخ النشر
2016
عدد الصفحات
79 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
طب الأسنان
تاريخ الإجازة
11/6/2017
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - الفم والأسنان - Endodontics
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 108

from 108

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM) compared to ProRoot white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) when used as furcation perforation repair materials. Methods: Eighty extracted human permanent mandibular molar teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=40) according to the type of perforation repair material. Each experimental group was then subdivided into 5 subgroups (n=8) according to the irrigant used (2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and distilled water).All samples were allowed to set for 48 h and stored at 37{u00BA}C with 100% humidity. After the experimental periods, the specimens were submitted to the push-out test and the failure modes were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: There was a non-statistically significant difference between all the experimental groups (p<0.05). ERRM had higher mean push-out bond strength when compared to WMTA. For ERRM, the statistical ranking of push-out bond strength was as follows within the experimental subgroups: EDTA > CHX > NaOCl > NaOCl followed by EDTA > Distilled water. For WMTA, the statistical ranking of push-out bond strength was as follows within the experimental subgroups: EDTA > NaOCl > CHX > NaOCl followed by EDTA > Distilled water. Conclusion: It was concluded that ERRM showed a promising result as a furcation perforation repair material owing to its ease of manipulation and unrestricted working time. The different root canal irrigants did not significantly affect the push-out bond strength of both ERRM and MTA