الفهرس 
أطر تقديم الأحداث الإرهابية في الصحافة الغربية : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
فهرس الموضوعاتيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 239 |  |  |
| | | from | 239 | | |
المستخلص
Accordingly, the study’s problem is focused on monitoring the frameworks for presenting terrorist events -specially events related to Islamophobia- on the websites of American, British, and Canadian English-speaking newspapers, in terms of the quality of the most prominent frameworks, determining the characteristics of these issues and the reasons for their origin in the treatment and proposed solutions to address these issues, and the aspects of agreement and difference between the sites of the study sample newspapers in terms of Frameworks and methods for dealing with these issues and terrorist incidents related to Islamophobia, from 2015 to 2021.
Results of the field of study that applied on the two samples show many conclusions summarized in the following points:
- The article or opinion materials, including caricatures, were the least used in all study sites, by 17.9% at The Times, 17.1% by The Globe and Mail, and 13.8% by The New York Times. , followed by news in third place in The Times website with 22.8%, 17.1% in The Globe and Mail, and 19.3% in The New York Times; In second place, the art of the news story emerged, with 16% in The Times, 17.1% in The Globe and Mail, and 20.1% in The New York Times.
- The site of the press article at the top of the page ranked first in both The Globe and Mail and The New York Times, with a rate of 44.3% in The Globe and Mail, and by 41.3% in The New York Times, while the website The press article ranked first in the center of the page on The Times website, with a rate of 40.7%, and the website of the press material came at the bottom of the page with a rate of 25.3% on The Times website, and with rates of 23.4% in The New York Times website, while in The website Globe and Mail came in at 15.7%.
Accordingly, the study’s problem is focused on monitoring the frameworks for presenting terrorist events -specially events related to Islamophobia- on the websites of American, British, and Canadian English-speaking newspapers, in terms of the quality of the most prominent frameworks, determining the characteristics of these issues and the reasons for their origin in the treatment and proposed solutions to address these issues, and the aspects of agreement and difference between the sites of the study sample newspapers in terms of Frameworks and methods for dealing with these issues and terrorist incidents related to Islamophobia, from 2015 to 2021.
Results of the field of study that applied on the two samples show many conclusions summarized in the following points:
- The article or opinion materials, including caricatures, were the least used in all study sites, by 17.9% at The Times, 17.1% by The Globe and Mail, and 13.8% by The New York Times. , followed by news in third place in The Times website with 22.8%, 17.1% in The Globe and Mail, and 19.3% in The New York Times; In second place, the art of the news story emerged, with 16% in The Times, 17.1% in The Globe and Mail, and 20.1% in The New York Times.
- The site of the press article at the top of the page ranked first in both The Globe and Mail and The New York Times, with a rate of 44.3% in The Globe and Mail, and by 41.3% in The New York Times, while the website The press article ranked first in the center of the page on The Times website, with a rate of 40.7%, and the website of the press material came at the bottom of the page with a rate of 25.3% on The Times website, and with rates of 23.4% in The New York Times website, while in The website Globe and Mail came in at 15.7%.