الفهرس 
تباينات معوقات التكامل في توطين المجمعات الصناعية المطورة
الملخص العربييوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 149 |  |  |
| | | from | 149 | | |
المستخلص
The research dealt with the evaluation of the discrepancies between the obstacles to integration
in the localization of industry in the developed industrial complexes, as it is part of the state’s
efforts after 2015 until 2030 according to the Egyptian strategic plan “Egypt Vision 2030”.
contrary to the purpose for which it was established.
The research highlighted the United Nations declaration of ”sustainable development”,
highlighting the efforts of the countries of the world to reach this declaration, which aims to
improve human conditions.
The Egyptian strategic plan ”Egypt Vision 2030” was dealt with with an explanation of the
objectives and dimensions in order to be able to address how it was planned to establish these
developed industrial complexes, and explain that these industrial complexes are part of the
state’s support for small and medium industrial projects, while addressing the legal definition of
the Central Bank of Egypt for this type For projects, with an explanation of the state’s efforts to
support these complexes within a comprehensive plan to support that level of projects, and an
explanation of the state’s initiative “Your Factory is Ready with a License”.
The research singled out the obstacles facing this national project for the development of small
and medium industrial projects within the Egyptian strategic plan ”Egypt Vision 2030”, and the
extent to which these obstacles vary in terms of economic, technological, and social obstacles.
And to achieve this, the process of evaluation and comparison (benchmarking) was conducted at
the level of the field study of a sample of the developed industrial complexes. The evaluation and
comparison were done by building a questionnaire and measuring its validity and distribution by
conducting a field study and evaluating the study variables and testing the main and subsidiary
hypotheses of the study, and drawing the following results:
1- The results of evaluating workers in the developed industrial complexes for the two
variables of the study proved the following:
• The workers’ awareness of each of the independent variables (industrial integration) and
its three dimensions (productive integration, technical integration, and marketing
integration) are high values in society and are greater than the value expected from the
researcher and estimated at (4).
• The awareness of the workers of the dependent variable (localization of the developed
industrial complexes) are high values in society and are greater than the expected value
from the researcher and estimated at value (4).
2- The results of testing the first main hypothesis and its three sub-hypotheses proved
the following:
The validity of the first main hypothesis, as it was proven that there is a significant relationship
between the application of industrial integration and the localization of the developed
industrial complexes, and that the value of (89%) of the changes in their localization resulted
from changes in (industrial integration) in these complexes.
• The validity of the three sub-hypotheses emanating from the first main hypothesis, where
it was proven that there are significant relationships between the three dimensions
(productive integration, technical integration, marketing integration) of the independent
variable (industrial integration) as independent variables and the dependent variable
(localization of the developed industrial complexes) and that the level of influence of
those The three dimensions of the independent variable on the dependent variable
through the coefficient of determination ( ) amounted to (92.2%, 91.5%, 44.8),
respectively.
3- The results of the tests for the second main hypothesis proved its validity through the
following:
• There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial
complexes in their perception of the independent variable (industrial integration)
according to gender.” This means the validity of the second main hypothesis according to
the demographic factor (gender).
• There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial
complexes in their perception of the independent variable (industrial integration)
according to age, and that workers with age (50 years and over) are the most aware of it,
while workers with age (less than 35 years) are the least aware of it.” The validity of the
second main hypothesis according to the demographic factor (age).
• There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial
complexes in their awareness of the independent variable (industrial integration)
according to the scientific qualification, and that workers with scientific qualifications
(postgraduate studies) are the most aware of the independent variable, while workers
with educational qualifications (intermediate education) are the least aware of this. This
means that the second main hypothesis is correct according to the demographic factor
(the educational qualification).
• There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial
complexes in their perception of the independent variable (industrial integration)
according to years of experience, and that workers with years of experience (15 years or
more) are the most aware of the independent variable (industrial integration), while
workers with years of experience (less than 5 years) They are the least aware of this
variable.” This means that the second main hypothesis is correct according to the
demographic factor (years of experience).
In light of the findings of the study, the researcher recommends that the following statements
in each of the three dimensions (productive integration, technical integration, marketing
integration) for the independent variable (industrial integration) and the dependent variable
(localization of the developed industrial complexes) have obtained the lowest value and then
the Management in the developed industrial complexes is necessary to take into account and
implement the following:
1. In Dimension (Productive Integration):
• The necessity for the Industrial Development Authority to increase interest in raising
the efficiency of implementing environmental requirements within the industrial
complex.
2. In Dimension (Technical Integration)
• The necessity for the Industrial Modernization Center to follow up on the availability
of specialized data necessary to keep pace with the (domestic - foreign) markets easily
for the development of the industry.
3. In Dimension (Marketing Integration):
• This dimension should be taken care of, as it has obtained the lowest value ( ) which
is equal to its value (44.8%) of the changes in its settlement of the developed industrial
complexes resulting from changes in the dimension (marketing integration).
4. In the dependent variable (localization of the developed industrial complexes):-
• The Industrial Development Authority must ensure that industrial security standards
are applied within the developed industrial complex