Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
A Single - level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion :
الناشر
Osama Abdalla Attia ,
المؤلف
Osama Abdalla Attia
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Osama Abdalla Attia
مشرف / Ahmed Rizk
مشرف / Hossam Salah
مشرف / Mohamed Elmasry
تاريخ النشر
2017
عدد الصفحات
190 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
تاريخ الإجازة
25/3/2018
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - كلية الطب - Orthopedics Surgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 199

from 199

Abstract

A prospective study carried on 30 patients suffered from incapacitating mechanical low-back pain with or without unilateral radicular pain undergoing minimally invasive TLIF with or without unilateral pedicle screw fixation (group I) or bilateral pedicle screw fixation (group II). Recorded demographic data included sex, age, preoperative diagnosis, and degenerated segment. Operative time, blood loss, hospital say length, complication rates, and fusion rates were also evaluated. The Owestry Disability Index (ODI) score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score data were obtained. All patients were asked to follow-up at 3 and 6 months after surgery, and once every 6 months thereafter. The mean follow-up was 26.6 months (range 18-26 months). The two groups were similar in sex, age, preoperative diagnosis, and operated level. The unilateral group had significantly shorter operative time, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital time than the bilateral group. The average postoperative ODI and VAS scores improved significantly in each group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to ODI and VAS. This study summarized that: -Age in-group I ranged from 23-71 with mean value 55.6±9.3 and in-group II ranged from 37-68 with mean value 56.2±8.0. There was no significant difference between the two studied groups regarding age. -Males were 8(53.3%) and females were 7(46.7%) in-group I, and in-group II, males were 10(66.7%) and females were 5(33.3%). -The blood loss was significantly less in-group I (unilateral) than in-group II (bilateral); and there was a significant shorter operative time in-group I (unilateral group) than in-group II (bilateral group). -Hospital stay in-group I ranged from 3-6 with mean value 4.3±1.2 and in-group II ranged from 4-8 with mean value 6.0±1.3. There was statistical significant difference between the two studied groups regarding hospital stay