Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Comparative Evaluation of The Marginal Fitness of Vonlay Nano-ceramic Hybrid Restorations Using Different Computer Add Imaging Techniques :
المؤلف
Salem, Zaynab Mohammed.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / زينب محمد سالم
مشرف / محمود عبد السلام شكل
مناقش / محمد صديق محمد
مناقش / منى حسام الدين مندور
الموضوع
Fixed Prosthodontics.
تاريخ النشر
2022.
عدد الصفحات
96 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
طب الأسنان
تاريخ الإجازة
19/12/2022
مكان الإجازة
جامعة طنطا - كلية الاسنان - Fixed Prosthodontics
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 131

from 131

Abstract

Purpose: the purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fitness of vonlay nano-ceramic hybrid restorations using different computer add imaging technique (an in vitro study). Materials and methods: Thirty 3D printed models of prepared premolar (no. 14) for vonlay restoration were fabricated using epoxy resin material and used for fabrication of thirty nano-hybrid ceramic vonlays (Grandio Disc, VOCO, Germany). three groups (n=10) of vonlays were fabricated using three different imaging technique: group 1: Imaging of conventional impression of master die, group 2: Imaging of stone master die and group 3: Imaging of master die using chairside TRIOS® Intraoral Scanners (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). vonlays were designed by using a CAD design software program(Exocad Dental CAD, Exocad, Germany). The vonlays were cemented over their corresponding dies with an auto mix dual cure adhesive cement system (Duo-Link universal resin cement, Bisco, Inc. Schaumburg USA) under a static load by using custom made seating device. Digital microscope was used to measure the vertical marginal gap for each. where a total of 120 measurements for the 3 groups (12 sites per vonlay and 10 vonlays per group) were evaluated. One-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the results, student sample t-test was used to examine the marginal gap (MG) differences of each group and in the same group. Results: A significant difference (P<.001) was found between the MG values of the vonlay restoration fabricated by using different imaging technique. The smallest MGs were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside Intraoral Scanners as compared with imaging of master die impression and stone master die. But, there was no significant difference between the MG measurements of different sides in the same group. Conclusion: The smallest MGs were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside Intraoral Scanners.