Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block versus Thoracic Epidural as Postoperative Pain Management in Modified Radical Mastectomy/
المؤلف
Farag,Michael Gamal Samaan
هيئة الاعداد
مشرف / مايكل جمال سمعان فرج
مشرف / شريف وديع ناشد
مشرف / أحمد علي الشبينى
مشرف / عمرو جابر سيد
تاريخ النشر
2022
عدد الصفحات
115.p:
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
التخدير و علاج الألم
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2022
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - Anesthesia
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 113

from 113

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Surgery is one of the mainstays of treatment of breast cancer, and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is one of the standard treatments for multi-centric disease or tumors with extensive coexistent ductal carcinoma in situ, where achieving a clear surgical margin becomes difficult with a segmental mastectomy. Aim of the Work: to compare between Serratus Anterior plane block and thoracic epidural as efficacy of postoperative analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy. Patients and Methods: This study was prospective controlled single blinded randomized clinical study, carried out in Ain Shams University hospitals, Cairo, Egypt over a period of 6 months. The study included adult female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy was randomly assigned into two equal groups by computer generated: group A: Included 15 patients received general anaesthesia preceded by Thoracic Epidural 9 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine at T4-T5 level. group B: Included 15patients received general anaesthesia followed by SAP block using only bupivacaine 0.25% (safety dose 3 mg /kg). Results: The haemodynamic data including heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure show a significant decrease in SAP group less than the TE group. The pain scale (VAS) showed a significant decrease in SAP group less than the TE group. The total opioids consumption was significantly less in SAP than TE group. The first rescue morphine analgesia (min.) was significantly higher in SAP group more than TE group. Conclusion: The SAP was effective and safe technique which provides better pain relief compared with the TE and reduced post-operative opioid consumption. Also, SAP was effective analgesic technique showing greater hemodynamics stability and less stress response to surgery compared with TE.