Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Combined Arthroscopic Wafer Resection and Triangular Fibro-Cartilage Complex Debridement Versus Ulnar Shortening Diaphyseal Osteotomy in Management of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome /
المؤلف
ElTayar, Ahmed Said Ali Gad.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / احمد سعيد جاد الطيار
مشرف / ابراهيم ابراهيم رخا
مشرف / عادل رشاد غزال
مشرف / سمير محمود الغندور
مشرف / آسر عبد الحى سالم
الموضوع
Orthopedic Surgery.
تاريخ النشر
2021.
عدد الصفحات
127 P . :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة قناة السويس - كلية الطب - orthopedic surgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 138

from 138

Abstract

Ulnar impaction syndrome is defined as an abutment of the ulna on the lunate and sometimes the triquetrum as a result of cumulative load increase across the wrist joint. It is also called ulnocarpal abutment syndrome which is a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain. The syndrome is a degenerative condition consisting of the triad of a triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear, a lunotriquetral ligament tear, and an ulnar positive variance. There is often chondromalacia of the ulnar head and proximal ulnar aspect of the lunate.
The aim of the clinical trial was to prospectively compare the functional outcomes of combined arthroscopic wafer resection and TFCC debridement with the ulnar shortening diaphyseal osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome.
Twenty-three patients were enrolled and divided randomly into two groups:
• Arthroscopic wafer resection with TFCC debridement (AWP group): eleven patients.
• Ulnar diaphyseal shortening osteotomy (USO group): twelve patients.
These patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Patients were 10 men and 13 women with an average age of 37 years, average variance of 3 mm. All patients were evaluated for clinical outcomes by MMWS and DASH score and radiographic features preoperative by MRI and X ray and finally by X ray to assess variance correction.
Our results reported that the operative time was significantly shorter in the AWP group. Clinical outcomes assessed by DASH and MMW scores showed significant improvement in both groups postoperatively. Comparing the results of