Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Evaluation of management of stage I and
stage II Enneking benign bone tumors with
pathological fractures /
المؤلف
El Gebery, Ahmed Osama.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Ahmed Osama El Gebery
مشرف / Amr Eid Darwish
مشرف / Bahaa Zakarya Hasan
مشرف / Ismail Tawfeek Abdelaziz
الموضوع
Orthopedic surgery- Congresses. bones.
تاريخ النشر
2021.
عدد الصفحات
90 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
تاريخ الإجازة
14/9/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنوفية - كلية الطب - جراحة العظام
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 108

from 108

Abstract

Benign tumors of bone represent a diverse group of
pathological and clinical entities.
They vary greatly in aggressiveness and clinical behavior, thus
requiring a broad spectrum of treatment. The diagnostic strategies for
benign bone tumors center around the initial radiographic
presentation.
The presentation of a child with a benign bone tumor to an
orthopedist is usually precipitated by the discovery of a bone lesion as
an incidental finding on a radiograph taken after an injury or because
of the onset of signs or symptoms, such as pain, a palpable mass, or a
pathological fracture. There is no single characteristic presentation for
all benign bone tumors, but there may be a highly characteristic
presentation for a given type of tumor, usually a specific constellation
of signs, symptoms, and radiographic findings.
Most pathological fractures in children are secondary to benign
tumors. Other causes should be kept in mind, especially secondary to
a malignant tumor, which is much rarer but different in the treatment
plan.
Dormans et al. have proposed grouping the treatment of
pathological fractures. The four types of fracture treatments include:
1) no treatment—the fracture and lesion may heal spontaneously; 2)
treating the fracture first and then the lesion; 3) treating the fracture
and lesion simultaneously; and 4) treating only the underlying
process— the fracture can heal with the treatment of the underlying
process.
References
86
References
1. Canavese F, Samba A, Rousset M. Pathological fractures in
children: Diagnosis and treatment options. Orthopaedics &
Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2016 Feb;102(1):149–59.
2. Hakim DN, Pelly T, Kulendran M, Caris JA. Benign tumors of
the bone: A review. Journal of bone oncology. 2015
Mar;4(2):37–41.
3. Ortiz EJ, Isler MH, Navia JE, Canosa R. Pathologic Fractures in
Children. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2005
Mar;432(1):116–26.
4. Snyder BD, Hauser-Kara DA, Hipp JA, Zurakowski D, Hecht
AC, Gebhardt MC. Predicting Fracture Through Benign Skeletal
Lesions With Quantitative Computed Tomography. The Journal
of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2006
Jan;88(1):55–70.
5. Patel B, DeGroot H. Evaluation of the Risk of Pathologic
Fractures Secondary to Metastatic Bone Disease. Orthopedics.
2001 Jun;24(6):612–7.
6. Mascard E, Gomez-Brochet A, Lambot K. Bone cysts:
Unicameral and aneurysmal bone cyst. Orthopaedics &
Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2015 Feb;101(1):119–27.
7. Yanagawa T, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, Takagishi K. Curettage
of benign bone tumors without grafts gives sufficient bone
strength. Acta orthopaedica. 2009 Feb;80(1):9–13.
8. Horstmann PF, Hettwer WH, Kaltoft NS, Petersen MM. Early
Clinical