Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Antigenic Relatedness of Some Commercially Available Avian Influenza Vaccines and the Circulating AI-H5Nx Subtypes in Egypt
/
المؤلف
Hamouda, Amira Hamdy
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Amira Hamdy Hamouda
مشرف / Hesham Abdel-Rahman Sultan
مشرف / Awad Abd El-hafez
مشرف / Mahmoud Gamil Ibrahim
الموضوع
Avian influenza influenza in birds
تاريخ النشر
2019
عدد الصفحات
125P ;
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
البيطري
الناشر
تاريخ الإجازة
14/4/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة مدينة السادات - المكتبة المركزية بالسادات - Department of Birds and Rabbits Medicine)
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 136

from 136

Abstract

In the present study, samples were collected from wild and domestic waterfowls during 2016 to detect currently circulating HPAI H5Nx viruses. All H5Nx detected in migratory ducks were characterized as HPAIV H5N8, clade 2.3.4.4b, while domestic waterfowls samples were characterized as HPAIV H5N1, clade 2.2.1.2. Partial HA gene sequencing followed by phylogenetic analysis of the obtained sequences of five selected isolates was performed. Phylogenetic analysis revealed clustering of the three H5N8 isolates in clade 2.3.4.4b, with other Egyptian H5N8 isolates with amino acid identity percent with each other ranging from (96.9% - 99.3%). The two H5N1 isolates clustered in clade 2.2.1.2 with other recent Egyptian isolates. The amino acid identity percent between vaccinal strains was ranging from (88.2% - 89.6%) with H5N8 field isolates and (96.5% - 99%) with H5N1 field isolates. The amino acid identity percent between H5N8 and H5N1 field isolates ranging from (86.3% - 87.8%).
Antigenic analysis of recently circulating HPAI H5Nx was conducted using cross HI test using antisera raised against (A/Teal/Egypt/Damietta-1/2016/H5N8 and A/Geese/Egypt/ Men-21/2016/H5N1) and three commonly used commercial vaccine strains. The antigenic relatedness between the two HPAI local isolates (H5N1 and H5N8) was low (R value 24.8%) indicating major antigenic difference between the two subtypes. Also, a major subtype difference in antigenicity (R value 20.7-31.0%) was also detected between the local HPAI H5N8 isolate and the three vaccinal strains. While minor subtype difference (R value 38.7-68.7%) was detected among the examined H5N1 local isolate and the three vaccinal strains. Our results support that, HPAI H5N8 virus is genetically and antigenically distinct from HPAI H5N1 virus. Also, some commercial vaccines which are used to control avian influenza in Egypt are genetically and antigenically distinct from HPAI H5N8 virus currently circulating in Egypt. Updating the HA of H5 Vaccine to be genetically and antigenically closer to the field viruses is recommended together with, regular monitoring of wild birds to predict and prevent possible AIV outbreaks.