الفهرس 
IntroductionOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 119 |  |  |
| | | from | 119 | | |
Abstract
To compare 6 months’ and 12 months’ urinary incontinence rates after sacrocolpopexy with burch colposuspension versus without Burch for continent women with stage 3 & 4 apical prolapse. Methods: This study was performed at Women Health hospital, Assiut university, Assiut, Egypt on 60 patients: Burch group: 30 were assigned to the Burch colposuspension with abdominal sacrocolpopexyWithout Burch group: 30 were assigned to the control group and underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy without the Burch colposuspension. In the study, POP women undergoing sacrocolpopexy were randomized to receive or not receive a Burch colposuspension. Outcomes included urinary symptoms, other pelvic symptoms, and pelvic support. Standardized pelvic organ prolapse quantification examinations and validated outcome measures including the the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire was completed before surgery and at several postoperative intervals, including at 12 months and urinary incontinence questionnaire.