Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
The Effect of Er:YAG Laser and various Surface Treatment Protocols on Surface Topography and Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber Posts /
المؤلف
El-Gedawi, Dina Mohamed Mahmoud.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / دينا محمد محمود
مشرف / مصطفي غيث
مشرف / مي هشام
مشرف / --
الموضوع
Endodontics. Er-YAG laser. Glass fibers.
تاريخ النشر
2020.
عدد الصفحات
iv, 79, 6 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
طب الأسنان
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2020
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - المعهد القومى لعلوم الليزر - الطبيه
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 109

from 109

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate morphology, surface roughness and mechanical properties of glass fiber Posts (GFPs) after different surface treatment protocols. Materials and methods: A total of forty GFPs with maximum diameter were be divided into four groups (n=10): GC- no surface treatment (control), GSB- sandblasted, GHF- hydrofluoric acid etched, GE- Er:YAG laser irradiated. The GFPs surface morphology was evaluated through scanning electron microscope (SEM), surface roughness was measured using surface profilometer and the 3-points bending flexural test measured flexural strength and elastic modulus. Results: SEM showed alternation of post surfaces after all surface treatments. Analysis of surface roughness demonstrated significant difference between the tested groups at p≤0.001. GSB (5.5±0.6) showed the highest roughness followed by GHF (3.9±0.3), GE (3.2±0.2), then GC (2.1±0.4). The 3 points bending test results were calculated and recorded insignificant difference between the tested groups at p=0.481 for maximum flexure load (N) as for the flexure stress at the maximum Flexure load (MPa) it was shown significant difference between the tested groups at p=0.009. GSB (697.1±96.9 N) showed the highest flexure stress (MPa) compared to GE (548±112.7 N) and GHF (572.9±102.6 N). Modulus of elasticity (GPa) showed significant difference between the tested groups at p=0.003. GSB (28.9±2.9 MPa) showed the highest modulus of elasticity (GPa) compared to GE (23±4.6 MPa) and GHF (23.6±4MPa). GC showed insignificant difference with all tested treatments. Conclusion: The different surface treatments used in this study showed alternations of GFPs surfaces. They had no influence on the mechanical properties of GFPs.