![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Twenty six patients (19 men and 7 women) with a mean of 57.69 (range 19-81years) and ECOG performance status ranged between1-3 were enrolled in this study. Patients with histopathologically or radiologically proved locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Forty two percent of patients (42.3%) were non smoker. Their main complaint was abdominal pain (100%) then jaundices (80.76%). As regard disease characteristics, pathological diagnosis of T3 in 15 patients was 57.7%; T4 in four patients was 15.4%. Twenty one of patients (80.76%) had tumor at head of pancreas, three patients (11.5%) at the tail, two patients (7.7%) at the body of pancreas. 15 of patients (57.7%) of patients were biopsied and 11 of patients (42.3%) were stented. After treatment of 26 patients with continuous infusion of gemcitabine over 6 hours weekly for seven weeks and then for d1, d8 every 3 weeks the patients were followed by multi-slice CT of chest & pelviabdominal and tumor marker CA 19-9. If there is radiological or biochemical response (partially or stationary), treatment was continued as d1&d8 every 3 weeks then assessment by CT of chest &pelvi-abdominal and tumor marker CA 19-9 every three cycle. There is response rate 39.5% in the form of complete response in one patient (3.8%), partial response in 7 patients (26.9%) and stationary response in 2 patients (7.7%). while there is disease progression in 16 patients (61.5%). Progression free survival (P.F.S) mean value was 3.65 months and median was 2.0 month while mean value of overall survival (O.A.S) was 5.69 months and median 4 months. Two significant prognostic factors were detected for progression free survival (PFS), performance status, biopsy taken and one significant Summary 95 prognostic factor was detected for overall survival (O.A.S), which is biopsy taken. Hematological toxicity was the most significant adverse effect. Grade 3, 4 neutropenia observed in 8(36.7%), 4(15.4%) patients respectively. Grade 2, 3, 4 anemia occurred in 9(34.6%), 13(50%), 2(7.7%) patients respectively, and grade 1, 2 thrombocytopenia in 5 (19.2%), 2 (7.7%) patients. Also non-hematological toxic effect was observed such as increased creatinine level in 6(23.0%) patients, nausea occurred in all patients (100%), vomiting grade 1, 2, 3 experienced in 4 (15.3%), 12(46.1%), 5(19.2%) patients respectively CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Improvements in gemcitabine efficacy might be achieved through modification of infusion rate, resulting in optimization of gemcitabine uptake and subsequent activation in tumor cells. Administration of gemcitabine at a fixed-dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg/m2/min, rather than a 30-minute bolus infusion, typically achieves steady-state plasma levels of 15 to 20 micromole/L, a value shown to be above that required to achieve maximal rates of dFdCTP accumulation. For most clinical trials of FDR gemcitabine, a dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min has been used to ensure that this threshold concentration is achieved. Moreover, several trials have evaluated gemcitabine at a3–6-hour infusion and shown substantial activity at considerably lower maximum tolerated dose ranging from 250 to 450 mg/m2. The number of patients included in our trial is limited and does not permit a precise assessment of this treatment approach. However, several conclusions can be drawn: First, treatment with gemcitabine in prolonged infusion appears as a feasible alternative to standard dose regimen but with a comparable efficacy for treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Second, because this 6-hour infusion regimen could still be given on an outpatient basis, decreasing the costs of the drug by approximately 75%, while not much additional costs are added, should encourage wider use of this effective combination, especially in regions of the world where resources are limited. Third, applying the prolonged infusion regimen in other malignancies (e.g., bladder, breast) should be encouraged. |