الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract In this work we aimed to: To asses bone mineral density in severe and moderate haemophilia a patient using osteoprotogrin level and DEXA scan. The present study was conducted on 35 haemophilic patient were recruited from Haematology Clinic, Children Hospital, Ain Shams University. All patients were males and 15, age matched normal subjects were included as control group, A verbal consent was obtained from patients or their parents or legal guardians before enrollment in the study. All patients included in this study were subjected to: 1. Complete history taking stressing on the following: Age Sex Severity History of hemarthrosis or history of any joint affection. Factor VIII level. 2. Clinical examination include Complete joint examination 109 3. Anthropometric measurement 4. Investigation Include 1. Prothrombin Time (PT), Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) and Factor VIII Assay. 2. Serum osteoprotogerin. 3. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans to asses whole body BMD. The study showed that 1. The mean value of Opg in Moderate cases was 11.557±6.541. 2. The mean value of Opg in Sever cases 11.764±4.902. 3. The mean value of BMD total in Sever cases was 0.877±0.058 4. The mean value of BMD total in Moderate cases was 0.826±0.092 5. The mean value of BMD z-score in Moderate cases was 1.112±1.087 6. The mean value of BMD z-score in Sever cases was 0.914±0.85. 7. There was non significant difference between case group and control group regarding age 110 8. There were non significant difference between cases with moderate or severe forms regarding age, weight, height or BMI. 9. There was non significant difference between moderate and severe cases regarding affected joints. 10. There were non significant difference between moderate and severe cases regarding all clinical manifestations including axial deformity, muscle atrophy, redness, stiffness, joint swelling and limited movements. 11. There was highly significant lower OPG level in case group compared control group. 12. There was non significant difference between cases with moderate or severe forms regarding OPG 13. There were non significant difference between cases with moderate or severe forms regarding BMD total and z-score. 14. There were non significant correlation between OPG and all parameters (age, weight, height, BMI and BMD) in moderate cases. 15. There was significant positive correlation between BMD total with age, weight and height. 16. There was significant positive correlation between BMD z-score and age. 111 17. There was non significant correlation between OPG and BMD z-score with all parameters (age, weight, height, BMI and BMD) in severe cases. 18. There was significant positive correlation between BMD total with age, weight and height. |