![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract There are different lines for treatment of Meniere’s disease including diet and lifestyle modifications, non-invasive pressure pulse generator (Meniett device), medications, pressure chamber treatment and surgical treatment. However, these lines of treatment are not preferred, except medications, due to high incidence of side effects especially surgical procedures as they are invasive lines which should only be used as the last resort. The success of a given treatment, medical or surgical, for Meniere’s disease must always be evaluated by its ability to ameliorate vestibular symptoms without affecting the cochlear component. Thus intratympanic applications for treatment of Meniere’s disease are evaluated as an alternative, less invasive line of treatment with better results. Intratympanic injection therapy of inner ear disease is safe, inexpensive and easy to perform. High inner ear medication concentrations can be achieved while minimizing systemic side effects. Most delivery methods are minimally invasive and can be performed in the office. The treatment is usually well accepted by patients. Vertigo control rates for Meniere’s disease have been excellent in comparison with other ways of treatment allowing intratympanic therapy to become one of the most prominent line of treatment for Meniere’s disease.With intratympanic gentamycin injections, side effects of ototoxicity occurring in approximately 30% of patients remain as one of the primary hurdles to overcome. However, most patients who experience hearing loss (non sreviceable hearing loss) do not complain of the loss and are simply happy to be free of the vertigo attacks. Intratympanic steroid injecyions were used initially for treatment of sudden sensori-neural hearing loss then used for treatment of Meniere’s disease. Steroid perfusion of the inner ear is variably effective for treatment of sudden sensori-neural hearing loss and is particularly indicated when oral steroid fail or are contraindicated due to other health reasons. There are many inner ear perfusion methods. Each technique has its associated advantages and disadvantages. The surgeon must decide which technique to use in concordance with the patient’s disease and expectations. |