Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Role of different imaging modalities in the assessment of breast implants/
المؤلف
Dallaa,Hala Mohamad charif
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / هالة محمد شريف دلاعة
مشرف / أ.د/ داليــــا زكى زيــدان
مشرف / د / إيمن محمد إبراهيــم
الموضوع
imaging modalities- breast implants-
تاريخ النشر
2014
عدد الصفحات
154.p:
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
الأشعة والطب النووي والتصوير
تاريخ الإجازة
1/6/2014
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - Radio Diagnosis
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 149

from 149

Abstract

Breast augmentation is a common cosmetic procedure, and many women who have undergone augmentation present for mammographic screening.
A wide variety of breast implants are available on the market and are broadly categorized by lumen number, filler type, and surface contour.
Breast implants can be surgically introduced using a variety of different approaches and are most commonly positioned either deep to the glandular tissue or deep to the pectoralis major muscle.
Although silicone and saline implants are the most common form of augmentation seen on imaging, there is tremendous variation in surgical techniques and materials throughout the world. Therefore, less common forms of augmentation, such as free silicone injection, polyacrylamide gel, and autologous fat augmentation, may also be seen when evaluating women in a screening or diagnostic setting. Familiarity with all forms of augmentation is important to maximize cancer detection and manage complications related to augmentation procedures.
Early postoperative complications of breast augmentation include hematoma and infection. Late postoperative complications include capsular contracture, silicone granuloma formation, and implant rupture.
Rupture is now recognized as an important and common complication of breast implants. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most accurate method for evaluating implant integrity but requires an understanding of the numerous variations in implant construction that are encountered clinically.
The appearance of breast implants at mammography, ultrasound and MRI are variable.
Knowledge of the variety of breast implant types will help reduce misdiagnoses by providing imagers with better understanding of the expected appearances of breast implants. This awareness with implant classification allow stratification of data for studying incidence, prevalence, and risk factors for and causes of implant failure, as well as permitting better correlation with patient symptoms and surgical outcome.