الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy are common and form one of the great triad, along with hemorrhage and infection, that continues to be responsible for large number of maternal death (Roberts, et al, 1989). It is a multlfacted syndrome with variable involvement of several organ system. The classic triad of hypertension, edema and proteinuria is stlll the most common presentation (Entmar, 1983). Most investigative efforts have focused on the hypertensive component of this disorder with reduced attention given to other equally important characteristics. Many studies indicate that pathologic and pathophysiologic changes in preeclamptic women are not secondary to increased blood pressure (Chesley 1978; Reberts, et al., 1989). Theories about pathophysiologic changes as activation of the coagulation cascade, increased sensitivity to pressors; reduced plasma volume, and abnormalities of renal proximal tubular function, all antedate increased blood pressure (Roberts, et al., 1989). One of such theories explained the physiologic abnormalities of preeclampsia by dysfunction of vascular endothelial cells (Roberts, et al 1989). Hubel, et al. (1989) have suggested that lipoperoxide levels in patients with preeclampsia increase beyond normal pregnancy levels and there is conflicting evidence regarding the role of the reduced uteroplacental perfusion which intensifies the release of placental lipid peroxidation products into the circulation. Upid peroxides are highly reactive and very damaging compounds. They are very toxic to enzymes. cells, and proteins (Mead, et al., 1986, Hennig et al., 1988). Although they affect many cellular components, the primary sites involve membrane associated polyunsaturated fatty acids and protein thiols. (Freeman and Crapo, 1982). In view of its potentially destructive character, uncontrolled lipid peroxidation has been suggested as an etiologic factor in preeclampsia (Roberts et al., 1989). Impaired function of the vascular endothelium may, in turn, cause vasospasm, the general increase in sensitivity to vasopressors, and associated cardiovascular complications occurring in the disease (Rodegers et al., 1988). Antioxidant mechanisms normally control lipid peroxidation and protect against its propagation. Deficiency of physiological free radical scavengers such as vitamin E, Selenium, glutathione and uric acid, causes oxidative stress With resultant overwhelming peroxidation process. (Warso and Lands, 1985). The placenta is a rich source of polyunsaturated fatty acids . (Ogburn et al., 1988), so the combination of increased oxygen radicals generated from thromboxane production With the high placental content of fatty acids would result in increased placental formation of lipid peroxides. Placental lipid peroxides apparently contribute to maternal circulating levels because plasma lipid peroxide levels decrease precipitately after delivery (Wickens et al., 1981). The placental tissue actively transports a small quantity of lipid by pinocytosis from the maternal blood to the cord blood and at the sametlme, it is possible that superoxide and lipoperoxides also reach the fetal tissue and affect its development (Yamaguchi et al., 1964). Yoshioka, et al., 1987, reported that maternal , fetal and placental levels of lipoperoxides and antioxidant change during pregnancy. Takehara et al ( 1990) confmned that the lipoperoxide concentration in blood of pregnant women increased as gestation progressed, but it was kept lower in the cord blood than in the maternal blood. Diamant et al. (1980) suggested that the placental tissue supresses lipoperoxide formation and protects the fetus from any kinds of radicals. Yoshioka et al., (1979) observed that antioxidant activity was higher in the maternal blood than the cord blood, however the difference was not statistically significant. |