الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Development of hwnanembryo is a complex, and evolurive process that requires accurate evaluation to detect any fetal malformation that may result in ethalor morbid outcome of pregnancy. Early and accurate antenatal diagnosis of fetal mosco.l.oskeleroI malformations and differentiation between a lethal and a non-lethal varieety has important implications for the managementofa pregnancy and prediction of fetal outcome.Il.ee e,l al. 2002 Three-dimensionel sonography revolutionized ultrasound imaging with its capacity to depict an unlimited number of planes in which the objec-t of interest can ’be displayed. The development of numerous computed modes of image rendering promotes three-dirnensionejsonography inobstetrics and gyneooIogy. The main advantage of threedimensional (3D) ultrasound in prenatal medicine and antenatal diagnosis indude scanning in the coronal plane, improved assessment of complex anatomic structures. sutfaceanalysis of minor de ects, volumetric measuring of organs, transparent imaging of fetal skeleton, spatial presentation of blood dow arborization. and, finally,. storage of scanned volume and images. Three-.dtm.eosionall sonography has gained a valuable place in prenatal diagnosis.becoming a necessity for every modem perinatal unit. (Korjak et a], 2000) This work will review the Iitcratllrcconcemoo with abnormalities of fetal skeleton and extremities including skeletal. dysplaslas and spine malformations. Previous literature concerning different 3D image display modes in visualizin.g fetal malformations: triplanar orthogonal display; surface display; and transparent display will be reviewed. (Merz and Welter, 2008) Today, every hospital and clinic has some form of ultrasound instrumentation to provide the clinician with, an inside look at the soft tissue structures within, the body. The two dimensional information is now able to be recreated into a three-dimensional format to provide a surface rendering of the area in que tion (Hagen, 200 I). It has boon almost four dec-ades since the first ultrasonic devices for imaging the fetus were developed. Conventional B-mode (two dimensional) ultrasound examination, which has been routinely used for the evaluation of fdalgrowth and development for more than two decades, has proved to be a powerful tool in modem ’0bsretrics, Its two major faj lings, have been operator dependency and the inability to archive and :review a complete examination. Its utility for dating pregnancies, assessing fetal growth and in detecting congenital malfonnations prenatally is well established (Reece and Chan, 1997).Although very accurate. two dimensional (2D) ultrasonography is due to phys ieal, anatomical and topographical reasons, still limited by the rather restricted number of planes in which the object of Interest can be depicted, Using 3D ultrasonography it is possible to depict an unlimited number of’dlfferent planes in which the object of interest can be displayed (Kos et al, 2002). bese last years, the use of 3 and mo e recently 4D (life 3D-US) ultrasound has extended greatly and pr-ovides a clearer image of the fetus, It is used as a complementary tool to the 2D ultrasound examination of the fetus. It provides (in selected indications) additional mformation, especially when searching for dysmorphologic syndromes (Avni et 31.2006). The ma}or advantage, OJf 3D, or ”volume” ultrasound, that it could render US far less operator-dependent, markedly decrease scanning times, and standardize the entire process of performing an examination (Benacerraf et al, 2006). Accurate prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia. ellows families to make appropriate decisions for. obstetric management and delivery. The specific diagnosis of a skeletal dysplasia in utero requires familiarity with a complex algorithm of ultrasonogrepbic (US) features. Although it is often di fficult to determine the specific type of skeletal dysp,lasia present and whether it is lethal, this information may be extremely valuable in planning obstetric care (Kareen et al, 2000). |