![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract S~U-M-M-A-R-Y-&--C-0-N~CL-U-~-r~O-~-S--~ Three field experiments were conducted at the Research and Experimental Station of the Faculty of Agriculture at Moshtohor, Zagazig, U~iver8ity in the three successive growing seasons of 1980, 1981 and 1982. Soil texture of the eXFerimental plots was clay. This investigation was carried out to study the effect of some soil tillage practices on growth ~~d yield of cotton. The aim of this study was to select the optimum tillage practices producing improved soil properties and sequently higher yield is resulted. The experiment included 10 treatments which were the combination of two subsoiling treatments and five different tillage methods. 1. Without subsoiling 2. With subsolling 1. One way ploughing with. Baladi (15 em depth). 2. One way chiselling (20 em depth). J. One way chiselling followed by one way harrowing (20 cm depth) • • L. ..• ~~-~--- ~ ._--~._. -~--_ ..~ -------- --~--------~--~--------- - 76 4. Two ways cniselling (20 cp depth). 5. Two ways chiselling followed by two ways harrowing (20 em dep t h ) • The experiments were designed in a split ~lot design. The obtained results could oe cWfu~arized as follOws: 1. One way ploughing either with Baladi or chisel plough had no effect on bulk density and porosity on the all hand. 2. One way chiselling followed by one way harrowing increased soil porosity decreased bulk density. ). Dry weight of roots was significantly affected by frequency of ploughing and harrowing. 4. The effect of frequency of ploughing and harrowing were significant on the dry weight of leaves/pl~~t. 5. There was a significant effect of frequency of ploughing and harrowing on the dry weight of stems. 6. Plant height of cotton was significantly affected by two ways chiselling followed by two ways harrowing. 7. Two ways chiselling followed by two ways harrowing increased number of open bolls/plant. 8. There was a significant effect of the frequency of ploughing and harrowing on the seed cotton yield in the three studied seasons. 9. SUbsoiling operation increases soil porosity and decreases soil bulk density. - ._. __._-- -_. --- -- ...._~ --_.-._--_._---------------~ 77 10. The effect of 6ubsoiling operations were signific~nt on the dry weight of roots. Using subsoiling produced the highest dry weight of roots/plaut. 11. Dry weight of leaves was significantly affected by s~b6oiling operations. Dry weight of leaves increased by using sUbsoiling. 12. The effect of subsoiling treat~ent were signific~~t on the dry weight of ste~8/plant. Dry weight of stems significantly increased by using suosoiling. 1). Plant height of cotton was significantly affected by subsoiling operation. The heighest plants were obtained by using subsoiling. 14. SUbsoiling operation increases the nuober of open bolls/plant. 15. Seed cotton yield was significantly affected by using su~soiling. Subsoiling operation increases seed cotton yield by 1) % to other treatments. 16. There was no significant effect of the interaction between subsoillng and seedbed preparation on soil bulk density, porosity and salinity of soil. 17. The highest increase in dry weight of different organs of cotton plant was obtained by two ways chiselling followed by two ways harrowing witn subsoiling. 18. Number of open bolls/plant was not si6nlficantly affected by the interaction between 6ubsolling and seedbed preparation. ---- ------------ ----------------------------- 78 19. Seed cotton yield was significantly affected by the interaction. The highest seed cotton yield was obtained by two ways chiselling followed by two ways harrowing with subsoiling. In conculosion frequency of ploughing and using 8ubsoiling increase the yield of cotton, but there is a little benefit in using two ways harrowing compared with the cost of frequency of harrowing. |