![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The term EIC applies to an invasive ductal carcinoma in which intraductal cancer is prominently present within the tumor or in sections of grossly normal adjacent breast tissue. Although EIC had previously been considered a contraindication to BCT, it is only a risk factor for local recurrence when the margins of resection are not evaluated (Harris, 1996) Compared with EIC-negative cancers, those with EIC-positive margins have a higher rate of true local recurrence, but not new ipsilateral primaries, contra-lateral breast tumors, or an increased likelihood of distant relapse. These data reflect the higher incidence of multifocality and residual cancer following excision of tumors with an EIC (Holland et al., 1990) As an example, in one study of 214 women who underwent mastectomy with detailed histological evaluation of the specimen, EIC-positive tumors were more likely to have prominent residual intraductal carcinoma at least 2 cm beyond the edge of the primary tumor (30 versus 2 percent in EIC-negative cancers) (Holland et al., 1990) In contrast, women with EIC and negative resection margins do not have an increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence following BCT (Gage et al., 1996) Therefore, routine assessment of the margins of resection is an important component of the histological evaluation in women undergoing BCT, particularly those with an EIC. A larger breast resection in such women might result in a smaller residual tumor burden and a reduced risk of ipsilateral recurrence following RT. |