Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
الرؤى السياسية للنص التوراتى
المؤلف
محمد محمد أبو المكارم البشرى,وفاء
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / وفاء محمد محمد أبو المكارم البشرى
مشرف / منى ناظم الدبوسى
الموضوع
نشأة الحركة الحسيدية من منظور تاريخى وفكرى .
تاريخ النشر
2010.
عدد الصفحات
302.P؛
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
اللغة واللسانيات
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2010
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الآداب - اللغة العبرية وآدابها
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 203

from 203

المستخلص

This study “ The Political Visions for the Text of The Torah, Study in Interpretations of the Hasidic Movement Chabad”, we selected Chabad movement because it is one of the largest ultra-Orthodox Jewish groups, not just in Israel, but in most countries of the World, as well as on policy positions of anti-Arab racism and the extradition of land, through their participation in political life in Israel.
The study differs into tow sections, five chapters, introduction, and conclusion:
Section one: “The Hasidic group Chabad” (Upbringing and development and the most important concepts)
Chapter one: “The genesis of the Hasidic movement from a historical and intellectual perspective”
We devote it to study The history of the Hasidic movement and its most important units, its important ideas, and its literary production.
Chapter two: “Chabad group and its role in the development of the Hasidic thought”
We devote it to study the history of the group, the most important presidents and opposition groups, and how it transformed from a small group to large group owns a number of centers in all parts of the world, also includes its role in development of the Hasidic thought, through the presentation of the main differences and similarities between them and other Hasidic groups, in addition as an account of the most important thing was produced and the most important sources relied upon by the group. We will study the Chabad’s method in interpreted the Bible by reading the most important writings in the interpretation of the Torah, analysis, their sources, and the most important differences in their approach to the interpretation of the Torah about the predecessors of the exponents of the Old Testament.