Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
اختيار وتقييم القائمين بالتدريب الإرشادي في الدورات الإرشادية الزراعية في مصر /
المؤلف
عبد الحليم، حنان كمال.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / حنان كمال عبد الحليم
مشرف / علي أمين قراعة،
مناقش / محمود الجمل
مناقش / علي أمين قراعة،
الموضوع
الدورات التدريبية. التدريب.
تاريخ النشر
1993.
عدد الصفحات
152ص. ؛
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
الزراعية والعلوم البيولوجية (المتنوعة)
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/1993
مكان الإجازة
جامعة بنها - كلية الزراعة - الاقتصاد الزراعي
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 171

from 171

المستخلص

SUMMARY AND RECOMMIND
Agricultural Extension is consi ered one of the most
important existing organization in t e agricultural sector
because it most important objective is creating a group
of behavioural changes for most peopl through the extension
educational process in which the exten ion agent is the change
agent. Because of the importance of the extension agents’
role, the extension organization must develops his knowledge
and skills through organizing training cources for developing
any defficiency occaring in his performance.
Taking in consideration that trainers is the corner
stone in the training process, where any deficiency in their
abilities, capabilites, and performance will affect undoubtedly
the general training level and realizing its desired
objectives.
For that, the training adminstration should card about
choosing the trainers according to some agreed upon criteria
to guarentee the success of training process, Consiquently,
it became a must to determine the most important of these
criteria from both the points of view of training experts
and extension agents for reaching a list which could be
utilized in chossing efficient trainers.
from that and due to the lack of studies in that field
this present study was carried aiming to relizing the following
objectives:
1. Determining the characterstics of the successful extension
trainers from both the points of view of extension experts
and extension agents and the degree of thier agreement
about such characteristice.
2. Determing the opinion of extension agents about the
esxestince of these charactrics for those trainers of
the sutdid training cource.
.u__ ~
3. Deducting the most important criteria utilized 1n choosing
extension trainers in A.R.E.
Five assumption were set up for realizing the objectives
of determining differaces in the opinion of both extension
experts and ext.Lns Lon agents about the most important
characteristics of the successful extension trainers.
This study was carried out in the 4 governertes of
Domietta, Dakahlia, Beni-Swief and El-Menia representing
all A.R.E. training governerotes in which studied process
was executed among governerotes. 8 destricts were chossen
from these 4 governerotes at a rate of 2 districts from each
--~-------------------------- -------------------
-2-
governerotes. This studied extension agents in the 4
governerotes of the study amounted is 945 ones. Date was
collected from all the 8 randomly choosen districts of the
4 studied governerotes who amountedto 208 extension agents
represinting 22% of their population and about only 8.05%
of the total extension agents attending this training cource
in the 11 governerotes. Also 17 extension experts were chossen
who 10 for them were been qualified academic personnal having
Ph.D in agricultural extension and 7 of them were executive
personnal from well experienced at least for 10 years in
extension training from the general administration of training.
Data was collected from the extension experts during
November and December 1991 and collected from the sample
of extension agents during May 1992 through 2 seperate designed
and tested queetionnaires.
The experts and the extension questionnaires included
information about the most important characterstics of
successful extension trainer under five main grou~s of
characterstics which were:
Knowledge and skills characterstics including 5 ones,
leadership characterstics including 8 ones, communication
characterstics including 12 ones, personal characterstics
including 10 ones and bodial and feature1 characterstics
including 3 ones. That made the total characterstics amounting
to 38 ones.
After collecting data, it was treated quantitatively
in which the importance of characterstics and their existance
were given degrees on the premention 3 degrees seals equal
to 3,2 and 1 respectively.
In presenting and analyzing data, tabulation, frequencees,
percentages and I Z I test statistical criteria and techniques
were utilized.
The most important results of the study would be
summerized under the following major 4 findings:
1. First: Extension experts openion about characteristics
of successful extension trainers:
Most of the experts agreed upon the importance
group of characteristics with percentages ranging
76.0% to 94.0%.
of a
from
The experts agree with 24 characteristics among 38
characteristics that is very important.
2. Second: Extensiopagents opinion about characteristics
of successful exteasion trainer:
The vast majority of the trainees agreed upon with ranging
-3-
from 76.0% to
characteristics.
92.0% the importance of some
The extension agents agree with 33 characteristics.
3. Third: Rilated to difference in both extension. experts
and agents about the importance of the characteristics
of extension trainer:
Both the experts and extension agents was an agreement
between the two studied l categories about 27
characteristics for the successful extension trainer.
4. Fourth: Related to trainees
of these characeristics for
opinion about the existance
the sudied training cource
trainees:
The majority of the trainees agreed upon that the present
of studied course trainers have completely the six
following characteristics which are:
Corectness of senses, correctness of the body and its
vitality, good looknes and appearance, enthusiasm, self
control and humbleness.
RECOMMINDATIONS
In the light of this research results:
1. The care of the responsible bodies about extension
training with including the demonstration side, practical
training and field visits in the future extension training
cources and with carsing about elongating the period
of these training cources to a more siutable period.
2. Taking in consideration the personal opinion of the
extension agents when nominating them for attending
the training cources, informing them with the content
of the training course before the course with a suitable
time for guaranteeing more ~nifiting and knowledge
about the suitability of the courses subjects for their
objectives and needs.
3. The care of responsible bodies about extension trai,ning
in choosing the trainers having the maximum possible
number of cbaracteristics of the successful extension
trainer.
4. Trying to develop most of these characteristics for
potential extension trainers specially the new persons
through continnous and serious training courses to be
’held for those potential trainer