الفهرس 
الباب الاولOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 108 |  |  |
| | | from | 108 | | |
Abstract
Structural Characteristics of Agricultural Extension
Organization in A.R.E.
Agricultural Extension is considered one of rural
development organizations which is to be responsible of
rural development society which its eim is not only helping
to increase productivity or to make progress technology
in techniques and agriculture methods; but also
further aims is extended to include meke rural social
promotion by making economic promotion. These are done
by benefiting from ell of the rural sources, natural
and human capacities to culture and aware fermers,developmental
capacities, improvement skills, modification scores
and styles of ideas. Through widening of agriculturel
extension services Bnd increasing its fields, it became
from necessary requirements for effectiveness capacity
agricultural extension, regulation efforts. All workers
in it allover the different levels. It could be noticed,
principal characters in agricultural extension, there are
formal administration organization and severel sub-divisions
for carrying out its role end responsibles for the required
work 1s large and quick clone.
The exiension organisation consists of several features
affecting its role and efficiency and these characters are
dependable on comparing seai-tissues of relationships. If
there is any difference or TariaDce in these features. It
shows inf’luence in the ou-put of the organization. For the
importance of standard features for the agriculture extension
its role for achievement extension work goals.
-2-
So, this study aimed to recognize on some standard
features of agriculture extension and its degree of,relationship
these characters with extension work gOals
through an attempt in realizing the following aims:
1. To find differences between participants extension
supervisors and local extension agents concern standard
characters for extension organization: size (A); The
area under which extension supervisors from either
of them extension supervisors, Size (B): No. of local
leaders, centralization, non-centralization, formulization
and circle of supervisors.
2. To find differences between governorates under study
concern ideas participants in standard characters for
extension organization size (A) the area under supervisor
by local extension agents.
3. To find differences between governorates under stUdy
concern id”eas of participants -in standard characters:
Size (A): area under supervision, Size (B): Bo. of local
leaders, formulization degree.
4. Find differences between extension organization
levels (national, gOTernorates • dis~rict , village),
concern ideas of participants in standard charecters
for •. centralization , non-centralization
degrees , fozmu11zetiOD degree, circle of supervisor.
~ - ---~~~~~~-
-]-
5. To find relationship between achievement of extension
work goals of compound characters for extension
organization, size (A) the area under supervisor,
~
size (B): No. of local leaders, centralization,
non-centralization, formslization degree, circle of
supervision •
The primary test carried out for application for
20 participants (guiders) from El-Beheira and Gharbia
Governorates. Also, for 20 supervisors from EI-Beheira
and Gharbia Governorates by interviews agricultural
extensions with supervisors. F-test has been used in
analytical data obtained. Also K2 tests have been
used to analysis the data.
It could be summarized the obtained results as follows:
1. Results of first aim:
Differences between supervisors and social agents:
a) Size (A): the area under supervision. there was
a significant difference between supervisors and
Agricultural Engineers.
b) Size (B): No. of local assistant Directors, there
are significant differences between supervisors and
agricultural extension.
-4-
c) Concern centrel Bnd non-centrel degrees, there ere
significant differences between supervisors and
agricultural engineers.
d) Concern, circle of supervision, there is a significant
difference between supervisors and agriculturel
extension engineers.
Results of second aim:,
Differences between (El-Beheire, Gharbia, Minia & Sohag
governorates of participants ideas in compound characters
for extension organization:
a) Size (A), the area: there ere a significant difference
between the four governorates.
b) Size (B) : No. of local leaders, there are significant
differences between the four gOTernorates.
c) Concern, central and non-central degrees, there are
significant differences between the four governorates.
d) Concern formal degree, there ere significant differences
between the four governorates.
e) Concern circle of supervision, there are significant
,differences between the four governorates.
-5-
Differences between extension organization levels
(national, governorate, district, village) of studied
variables:
i ”.
a) There ,are significant differences in central and
non-central degrees.
b) There are significant differences in formal degree.
c) There are significant differences in circle of
supervision.
Relationship between extension work achievement anrl
studied variables:
a) Size (A): concern cultivated area, there is a significant
relationship.
b) Size (B), No. of lOcal supervisors, there is a
significant relationship.
c) Concern central and non-central degrees, there is
a significant relationship between them.
d) Concern formal degrees, there is a significant
relatlonahlp between them.
e) Concern circle of supervision. there is 8 significant
relationship between them.