![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract SUMMARY . The effect of irrigation after a depletion certain amounts of available soil moisture content, as well as the effect of water stress during the different stages of growth on two corn varieties on growth, chemical content, yield, yield components and quality of corn grains, was studied during 1979 and 1980 seasons at the Faculty of Agricultural Science Farm at Moshotohor Kalubia Governorate, Egypt. Four field experiments were carried out. Twoexperiments were performed in 1979 and 1980 seasons to study the effect of irrigation after depletion certain amounts of available soil moisture (60%, 8~, 100%, lO<m for one week, 100%for two weeks and 100%for three weeks). Every experiment included six treatments of irrigation regimes, the treatments in the two seasons were arranged in a complete randomize block design in five replications. corn cultivar D.C. 19 was sown on 23 and 20 Kay 1979 and 1980 respectively. Other two experiments were performed in 1979 and 1980 seasons to study the effect of water stress during the different stages of growth on two corn varieties. Every experiment included 8 treatments which were the combination of two corn varieties (Double Cross 19 and American Early) and four water stress treatments. The water stress treatments were as follows: 1. Irrigation after depletion 50% of available soil moisture during all growth season. 2. Irrigation after depletion 5~ of available soil moisture during all growth season, with the exception of vegetative stage in which plants exposed to water stress. 3. Irrigation after depletion 50% of available soil moisture during all growth season, with the except ion of flowering stage in which plants exposed to water stresS. 4. Irrigation after deplet ion 50% of available soil moisture with the exoeption of maturity stage, in which plants exposed to water stress. Treatments were arranged in a complete randomize block design in five replications. Qharaoters studied: !.. Growth: 1. Time of tasseling, 2. Time of silking, 3. Plant height, in cen~imeters) 4. Percentage of lodged plants, 5. Percentage of barren plants, 6. Percentage of green plants, 7. Bar position, in centimeter, 8. stem diameter 2 and 9. 4~ leaf area, in ems ~ B. Yield: 1. Number.of ears per plant, 2. 11arlength, in cms. 3. Ear diameter, in cms~ 4. Ear weight in gm, 5. Ear grain weight in gm,. 6e Numberof rows per ear, 7•. Number of grains per row, 8e Shelling percentage, 9. Grain yield per plant in gm, 100 Ear yield kgs per faddan, 11. Grain yield kga per faddan, 12 .•”eight of 100 grain, in gm, and 13 straw y:le1.d kgs/faddano c~ f.o..ohnologicel 2!”Opert1ea~ 1. Hectolitter weight, 2. Embryo percentage to total grain weight, ). Bndosperm percentage to total grain weight, 4. Testa percentage to total grain weight, 5. 011 percentage, 6. crude protein percentage, end 7. B’tIarch peroentage. d. Chemical constituent~: 1. TotaI, free and bound water content in 4~ leaf, 2~ Free sugars content in 4-th leaf, ). Total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents in 4-th leaf, and 4. Amino acids contents in 4-th leafThe following are the most important reeul ts: Effect of irrigation after depletion certain amounts of available solI moisture: I. Growth: 1. Increasing depletion of available soil moisture affected significantly all growth characters in 1979 and 1980 seasons. |