![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The present work deals with the subsurface formation evaluation ofNukhul and Nubia formations encountered in eleven wells (Hil-Al , Hil-A2A, Hil-A3B, Hil-A4, Hil-AS, Hil-A6A, Hil-A8, Hil-A9A, Hil-AIDA, Hil-AlIand Hil-A12A) scattered in the study area, southern Gulf of Suez. The area under studt is located in the south Ghara concession, southern Gulf of Suez with latitudes 27° 48 and 27° 51’ N and longitudes 33° 42’ and 33° 44’ E. The sedimentary sequence ranges in age from Pre-Camberian to Recent. The investigated section includes Nukhul and Nubia formations of Miocene and Paleozoic ages; respectively. The Nukhul Formation consists mainly of sandstone and shale with variable amount of anhydrite and limestone. The depositional environment of Nukhul sandstone includes shallow marine and probably supratidal for the dolomitic sandstone unit. It is considered as one of the main hydrocarbon bearing rock units in the southern Gulf of Suez. The Nubia Formation has a considerable thickness and composed mainly of kaolinitic sandstone intercalated with shales. The depositional environment of Nubia sandstone is shallow marine. It is considered as the main reservoir in the study area and an important rock unit for petroleum prospectors, because of its high content of hydrocarbons. The available data used in the subsurface formation evaluation of the two studied formations are in the form of resistivity log (deep induction log), porosity tools (sonic, density and neutron logs), gamma log and conventional (routine) as well as special core analysis. The most important conclusions revealed from” this study can be summarized as follows: Structural Configuration: The structural features of the study area have been clarified from previous work of seismic data. It has been found that the main structure of the field is a southwesterly dipping Pre-Miocene faulted block. These faults are step-like horst and graben and some of which dissect the top of Nukhul and Nubia formations. The Miocene evaporites provide ultimate seal for the structure. The field is delineated by faults to the north, south and east, while the oil water contact (o.w.c) controls the western field limit. Graphical Well Logging Analysis: Such analysis is diversified into Porosity- Resistivity (Pickett plots), Dia- and Tri-porosity cross plots. Porosity-resistivity cross 285 plots are applied to determine the formation water resistivity (Rw), the water tsoattaulraptoioronsit(ySw(0}t,). the hydrocarbon saturation (S,,), the formation factor (F) and the The Dia-porosity cross plots (using the porosity tools pb, t.t and ON) are applied to determ ine the volume aI’shale (Vsh), the effective pores ity an d the type 0 f shale distributed in the rocks (laminar, structural and dispersed). Also, frequency cross plots are Constructed between M values against log readings of dcnsity, sonic, neutron and resistivity to determine the shale parameters (psh, Atsh, ONsh and Rtsh) and to show the distribution of the plotted points among the pure minerals. Moreover, such plots are used with the matrix parameters (pma)a and (Atmaj» versus Vsh to determine the environment of deposition. The Tri-porosity cross plots, on the other hand, are used to identify the lithologic constituents of the studied rock units. Anal tical Well La com nterized : The computcr program (PETCOM) was applied for fonnation evaluation. The procedure followed in this work includcs the determination of the formation water resistivity (Rw) at formatiol1 temperature. The total and the effective porosities (Ot, Oe) are calculated using sonic, density and neutron logs. The gamma ray, resistivity and neutron logs were used to estimate the shale volume (Vsh). The different values ofVsh are Corrected and calibrated to give the optimum values required for further interpretation. The determination and discrimination of the fluid saturations (Sw and S,,) are carried OUI for both clean and shaly zones. Also, the percentages of the different constituents of the rocks are calculated to achieve the lithologic identification. graphTichaelly prroepccrsesseendtedweblly: logging results for the various investigated wells were I) Lpiatrhaomloegtyer-ss.aturation cross plots to show the vertical variations of the calculated 2) Iso-parameter maps to show the lateral variations of the same parameters. Subsurface Evaluation: includes a general study of the subsurface geology of the Gulf of Suez in which the geological and stratigraphical informations were gathercd from the studied wells and interpreted with respect to the prevailing geologic conditions during depOsition. This study resulted in some modifications in the subsurface maps (structure and isopach maps). Such studies resulted in thickness variations maps and Lithofacies analysis considering the two studied formations, as well as, frequency cross plots for depositional environment determination. The study of isopach maps for the two 286 ------- -~~--~---~-- evaluated formations reflects a marked increase in thickness towards the west and the northwest directions. The lithofacies analysis of Nukhul Formation indicates that it is composed of shale with varying proportions of sandstone, anhydrite and limestone. The shale content increases to the north and northeast directions, while sandstone increases towards the west and northwest directions. The anhydrite content increases to the northwest and southwest directions. Carbonate rocks, on the other hand, show a general increase to the northwest direction. The lithofacies analysis of the Nubia Formation shows a 11011hand northeast decreasing of shale content. Sandstone content on the other hand, tends to decrease in the northeast and southeast directions associated with a marked increase in kaol initc content from east to west and from south to north. Moreover, the Frequency cross plots reveals a condition of sea level fluctuation from an open sea (deep-marine) environment of deposition to shallow-marine and epi-continental conditions at the latter depositional stages ofNukhul Formation. On the other hand, a condition of shallow-marine environment of deposition is suggested for minerals forming Nubia Formation. Hydrocnrbon Potcntinlitics: the vertical and lateral distribution of the hydrocarbon occurrence is represented in two ways: the first is the Litho-saturation cross plots or the eleven evaluated wells and the second are a number of iso-pararneteric maps. The Nukhul Formation consists mainly of shale associated with variable contents or sandstone, anhydrite and limestone. A general decrease of carbonate matrices with depth is observed. Nubia Formation is mainly composed of kaolinitic sandstone with few contents of shale. The effective porosity gradient ofNukhul Formation shows a general increase from east to west and from south to northwest. On the other hand; with respect to Nubia Formation, the effective porosity tends to increase from west to east and from south to north. The water saturation of Nukhul Formation is decreased from northeast to southwest and from east to west and ranges from 15% to 100%. The water saturation of the Nubia formation on the other hand, is decreased from southwest to the northeast and ranged from }0% to }00%. The hydrocarbon saturation ofNukhul Formation is increased from east to the west and almost the same from southwest to the north and northwest and ranged from 70% to 90%. Some gas content is only recorded in Nukhul Formation at the southwest. The hydrocarbon saturation of Nubia Formation is decreased from the northeast to the northwest and southwest and ranged from 50% to 1.00%. The petroleum geology of the study area is also considered in terms of hydrocarbon habitat (source, reservoir and cap rocks), hydrocarbon generation, migration and accumulation and hydrocarbon entrapment (stratigraphic and structural traps). 287 ----- ---- --------- from the previous study, we recommended more study on the western side of Hilal field area, which is Controlled with oil water Contact (o.w.c) and construct oil water contact maps, then <lpplied such maps in future prospects. |